5 Filters

Lee Merritt links five gee, jabs, and bioweapons

It’s video and an hour 20 long, but that said Lee Merritt is always worth the time. If you don’t know who she is, go back to the thread posted by @RhisiartGwilym on her evidence to The Corona Investigating Committee. Dr. Lee Merritt speaks to Reiner, Wolfgang and Viviane. NOT TO BE MISSED!

Specifically, in the early part of the video, she links squalene and hydrogel in the jabs, to activation by five gee and parasites causing cancer. Not her own work and she credits the sources, but she puts pieces together.

3 Likes

Ickean territory! But still worthy of attention all the same. Some useful insights and information mixed in with the wild speculation and the NAmerican bible-literalist goddery.

Hi @PatB , thanks for the post - intuitively it makes perfect sense if anti-parasitic medicines like ivermectin and HCQ are effective against “covid” then “covid” is very likely to be parasitic! And if the jab ( whether covid or earlier flu types) contains artificial parasites through hydrogel and emf exposures ivermectin and HCQ could work against those as well.
Pointing out that flu jabs could have been used to get the hydrogel into us at an early stage combined with early 5g rollout in places like Wuhan and I think in Italy in 2019 reinforces the artificial parasite hypothesis, imo. It would also explain the weird stuff found in the arteries of the dead by morticians!
Originally I just thought that HCQ and Ivermectin were outlawed because no emergency use authorisation could be declared where a suitable medical treatment was available and so these medicines would kill vaccines before they got off the ground! But the parasite argument just reinforces the absolutely critical role propaganda and medical controls have played in suppressing these effective and safe solutions from the beginning!

Seems pretty obvious once it’s pointed out to us!

cheers

3 Likes

Just to throw this in here as it may be relevant to the discussion.

A recent study comparing two vaccinated populations - one that that had mycarditis and one that did not - found that only the myocarditits group had markedly elevated free full-length spike proteins in the blood.
Apart from tying the spike protein further to vaccine myocarditis, I wondered if there might be some good news arising from this for people who have been vaccinated. Does the absence of spike proteins suggest that at some point they pass the danger point for myocarditis, at least?
Not all myocarditis is straight after the jab but the fact that the SP were still there in the myocarditis group might mean that being free of spike proteins means being free of the myocarditis risk. (obvious implication for boosters).

Pity this progress is so agonizingly slow! In the purely fictitious, imagined world of rigorous safety studies the powers want you to believe exists, you might be forgiven for naively thinking that frenzied safety studies would be raging along in order to get such answers post-haste, in order to reduce harm. :neutral_face:
ED

Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis

Lael M. Yonker,

Zoe Swank,

Yannic C. Bartsch,

Madeleine D. Burns,

Abigail Kane,

Brittany P. Boribong,

Jameson P. Davis,

Maggie Loiselle,

Tanya Novak,

Yasmeen Senussi,

Chi-An Cheng,

[ … See all authors ](javascript:void(0))

Originally published4 Jan 2023https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025Circulation. 2023;0

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Cases of adolescents and young adults developing myocarditis after vaccination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–targeted mRNA vaccines have been reported globally, but the underlying immunoprofiles of these individuals have not been described in detail.

METHODS:

From January 2021 through February 2022, we prospectively collected blood from 16 patients who were hospitalized at Massachusetts General for Children or Boston Children’s Hospital for myocarditis, presenting with chest pain with elevated cardiac troponin T after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We performed extensive antibody profiling, including tests for SARS-CoV-2–specific humoral responses and assessment for autoantibodies or antibodies against the human-relevant virome, SARS-CoV-2–specific T-cell analysis, and cytokine and SARS-CoV-2 antigen profiling. Results were compared with those from 45 healthy, asymptomatic, age-matched vaccinated control subjects.

RESULTS:

Extensive antibody profiling and T-cell responses in the individuals who developed postvaccine myocarditis were essentially indistinguishable from those of vaccinated control subjects, despite a modest increase in cytokine production. A notable finding was that markedly elevated levels of full-length spike protein (33.9±22.4 pg/mL), unbound by antibodies, were detected in the plasma of individuals with postvaccine myocarditis, whereas no free spike was detected in asymptomatic vaccinated control subjects (unpaired t test; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Immunoprofiling of vaccinated adolescents and young adults revealed that the mRNA vaccine–induced immune responses did not differ between individuals who developed myocarditis and individuals who did not. However, free spike antigen was detected in the blood of adolescents and young adults who developed post-mRNA vaccine myocarditis, advancing insight into its potential underlying cause.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025

1 Like

Some more on this theme, hopefully.
Interesting that it’s a health writer doing the spadework.
ED

Contentious COVID-19 Drugs Are All Antimalarial: May Not Be a Coincidence

The COVID-19 recommendations hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and now artemisinin all have one thing in common: They are antimalarial drugs or have such properties.

Yet studies suggest that this may not be a mere coincidence; malaria and COVID-19 may be more similar than people may realize.

Malaria Versus COVID-19

From the outset, malaria and COVID-19 are very distinct diseases.

Malaria is a parasitic disease. An infection starts when an individual is bitten by a mosquito carrying a parasite from the Plasmodium genus. Upon infection, the parasite first goes to the liver and multiplies in liver cells. Then it migrates to the bloodstream, invades and proliferates in red blood cells, and causes these cells to expand and burst.

Common malaria symptoms such as fever, chills, and sweating occur during the blood-stage infection. Complications include anemia, and on rare occasions, cerebral malaria, liver failure, fluid buildup in the lungs, and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

COVID-19, on the other hand, is a viral disease. Infection occurs primarily through the inhalation of contaminated droplets. The virus invades the body through the nasal cavities, entering the upper and then lower respiratory tracts.

Inflammation of the lungs ensues as the body’s immune cells fight off the infection. The person’s oxygen levels start dropping as inflammation worsens in the advent of a cytokine storm, and the lungs become damaged. Some of the virus can also go into the bloodstream and invade other organs, causing systemic inflammation and damage.

Several Commonalities

While one mainly affects blood cells and the other primarily affects the lungs, both diseases are characterized by a strong inflammatory response early in the infection, according to a 2022 paper in Frontiers in Immunology.

Symptoms-wise, both infections from malaria and COVID-19 can lead to fever, fatigue, shortness of breath, diarrhea, and muscle pain.

If inflammation is prolonged, the body will experience a significant increase in cytokines, and individuals can become severely injured or even die.

The two diseases are also similar in that they both sequester iron, use the same receptors in their pathogenesis, and even share similar structures in their proteins.

Iron Storage

Both the Plasmodium parasite and the SARS-CoV-2 virus require iron to proliferate. Therefore, both the parasite and the virus need to store iron inside the ferritin protein within infected cells. High or increased levels of ferritin are therefore an indication of severe disease and inflammation.

Drugs that are capable of targeting iron storage or preventing proliferation may therefore be successful in treating both malaria and COVID-19.

Similar Receptors

The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor is involved in both malaria and COVID-19 infections.

In COVID-19, the virus binds to ACE-2 to invade cells. ACE-2 is ubiquitous within the human body, present within at the very least:

  • Lungs
  • Blood vessels
  • Muscles
  • The gut
  • Nerves
  • Stomach
  • Heart
  • Kidneys
  • Pancreas
  • Testes
  • Uterus

Organs that have a high number of ACE-2 receptors are therefore at a higher risk of COVID-19 infection.

The significance of ACE-2 in malaria is uncertain. However, one study, as well as the one published in Frontiers in Immunology, showed that people who have their ACE-2 receptors reduced due to genetic predispositions are more resistant to malaria.

According to the Frontiers in Immunology study, malaria parasites use the CD147 receptors on red blood cells to gain entry into the cell. The COVID-19 virus also uses CD147 in the absence of ACE-2 receptors. CD147 has also been linked to the formation of blood clots in COVID-19 infections.

Therapeutics that can target CD147 and ACE-2 may be successful in treating both malaria and COVID-19.

Similar Protein Structures

Additionally, both pathogens share a degree of overlap in their protein structures. The COVID-19 surface N protein has at least 40 percent structural similarity with important malarial proteins in charge of transport, attachment, and invasion.

This means that drugs that can target malarial proteins may also be able to target SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins.

Antimalarial Drugs Used in COVID-19

Early in the pandemic, many studies recommended antimalarial and anti-parasitic drugs such as hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, ivermectin, and artemisinin as potential treatment options for COVID-19. These recommendations, however, soon received backlash, with one reason being that malaria and COVID-19 seem to be very different diseases.

But many doctors and studies found these therapeutics helpful in treating acute COVID-19. Professor Jose Luis Abreu, whose specialty is in plant science at The State University of Nuevo León, used the proposition of “parallelism between malaria and COVID-19” as an explanation for why antimalarial drugs such as ivermectin, artemisinin, and hydroxychloroquine may be applied to COVID-19 in his protocol.

Have Potent Anti-Inflammatory Properties

Hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, ivermectin, and artemisinin are all very potent anti-inflammatory drugs.

According to a study published in The Journal of Antibiotics, ivermectin is an immunomodulator in COVID-19, meaning that it does not suppress the immune system, but regulates it so that it does not become hyperinflammatory and damaging.

Hydroxychloroquine and artemisinin have similarly been shown to have immunomodulating effects. Hydroxychloroquine is also approved to treat autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus (pdf).

Studies like the one in The Journal of Antibiotics have shown that ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and artemisinin may be able to prevent cytokine storms and scarring of the lungs. Abreu has pointed out that artemisinin, due to its reaction with iron molecules, can also produce oxygen as an end product, helping to alleviate hypoxic conditions.

As aforementioned, COVID-19 infections have also been associated with iron sequestration for viral proliferation. Abreu argued that artemisinin, whose primary role in malaria is to target iron storage by releasing free radicals, would also do the same in COVID-19-infected areas and kill infected cells and viruses.

Block COVID-19 Receptors and Proteins

In simulation studies, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and artemisinin can bind to SARS-CoV-2 N proteins, which have structural similarities with malaria proteins. In treating malaria, hydroxychloroquine and artemisinin have been shown to block malarial proteins from replicating and proliferating.

All three drugs can also bind to CD147 and ACE-2 receptors, as previously reported by The Epoch Times. These drugs can also bind to COVID-19 spike proteins directly to prevent viral attachment to cell receptors and also prevent viral proliferation by blocking proteins that take part in viral replication.

Meplazumab, an antibody that has been approved for use in malarial treatment for its anti-CD147 activity, has also been beneficial in treating COVID-19 pneumonia.

Antimalarial Drugs Are Also Anti-Cancer?

Ivermectin, artemisinin, and hydroxychloroquine have also been found to have anti-cancer properties.

It is interesting to note that some studies have also postulated that cancer acts like a parasite. Like external parasites, cancer depends on its host—the human body—for food, but operates independently and often to the detriment of the host.

Abreu said that a common feature among malaria, cancer, and COVID-19 is that all of them require iron for proliferation, and therefore, artemisinin has been used with success in preventing malaria, cancer, and COVID-19.

Abreu wonders if there is a link between parasites, viruses, and cancer, saying that further studies should be done on these matters.

Ivermectin has been found to prevent cancer cell proliferation and metastasis, and also encourage cancer cell deaths in several types of cancers. It can also prevent the formation of blood vessels, which cancer cells need for deriving oxygen and nutrients.

Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine can also prevent blood vessel formation and autophagy. Autophagy is a process that removes waste from the body, then reuses and recycles cell content. The process is a double-edged sword, and in some cases can improve the survivability of cancer cells, hence why autophagy inhibitors can also prevent further cancer development.

1 Like

Thanks for the post @Evvy_dense I looked at the supporting article on which the Epoch Health feature was based :

  • it seems pretty convincing and fits with a lot of the stuff we’ve been looking at on 5F.

One glaring point is missed entirely - the article makes the point that ACE2 receptors are a key to how the “virus” enters the human cell, the less receptors the less likely the person seems to be susceptible to both “Covid” and malaria - but the writers fail to go on to the next obvious point that the more the receptors the greater the exposure to these 2 conditions, which would then lead you to the ubiquitous prescription drugs that increase ACE2 receptors like blood pressure drugs and statins. Zach Bush made this point early on about the link. I think ZB did state that this could be one of the underlying reasons why the condition was and is found more in the elderly with comorbidities who are more likely to be taking a whole series of drugs “up-regulating” ACE2 receptors.
The article is very light on “mrna vaccines” which are said to produce stuff that also uses ACE2 receptors to get into our cells!

I’m rerunning Dr Lee Merritt’s video posted by @PatB above as it still seems to be one of the really best explanations and in which she confirms she is a “no virus believer” which at the moment is my favoured position!

cheers