I imagine he’ll censor it, but I’ll be interested to see whether he takes the bet. Extraordinary how the sharpest minds can still stumble away from credibility, due to their own naturally high hypnotic suggestibility, innit? b, Saker, George Galloway, on and on…
Link to b’s piece here:
My response:
SELFQUOTE:
I understand that you’ve bought into the scamdemic narrative, b, and that you operate a censorship against anyone who tries to argue that that’s what it really is. So I won’t try to offer any of that mass of sound arguments and evidence that demonstrate the reality of the scam.
Instead, I’ll offer you a bullion bet: My whole British Sovereign coin against your half-sovereign that at Christmas time next year, the ‘Ohmycrud!!!’ mutation will have proved to be just as much of a damp squib as have it’s - alleged - predecessors. And the (real) all-causes excess death toll (if you can find any chance to get an actually trustworthy estimate) will, as has happened so far in the whole wilfully-artificial covid panic, be about what you might expect from a bad-flu year.
There now, excellent realpolitik analyst that you are, normally (not being snide; I mean it!), censor this post if you please… But, you know: How about taking that bet…? You have my email address. Drop me a line if you’re on! Best, Rh.
UNQUOTE