They discuss the peculiar way the - as Joe says - blatant murder of Epstein simply dropped off the ‘news’ flow. In particular, they discuss the way ‘news’ editors decide what to ignore, and why. A further illustration of how non-conspiracies end up producing pretty much the same effect as overt conspiracies: lots of little goodthinker careerists making separate decisions without conferring, but all on the same long-conditioned and heavily-filtered doublethink autopilot. Bingo! No conspiracy needed, but as good as if it had been!
