Ignore Meryl at your peril.
Jeffrey Sachs criticizes US militarism only because he’s establishing a new brand
The apparently outspoken Sachs, as a critic of US foreign policy, is seen by many on the supposed left as a bit of a hero. For example, he blamed the Nordstream pipeline attack on the US.
Confusingly, he also headed the Lancet commission, which although critical of the p(l)andemic response, but seemingly in mostly the wrong ways.
A good critique here by David Bell of the Epoch Times
A Critique of The Lancet COVID-19 Commission
Lancet is the once-revered body who provided us with the fraudulent and arguably genocidal hydroxychloroquine-is-dangerous study which prevented millions of people from being saved by early treatment and helped secure the financial viability of mRNA vaccines.
Even now, the Lancet commission continues to bang on this drum. For example you will find references to the (newly invented) dangers of hydroxychloroquine as well as ivermectin. As David Bell relates,
" A lack of early effective treatment was necessary to secure Pharma profits for later COVID-19 medications and vaccines. The later exposure of the fraud was subsequently described by The Guardian and was one of the biggest retractions in modern history."
Incidentally this is, as far as I know, the only useful pandemic truth the Guardian got behind.
But what’s going on with Sachs? Meryl Nass explains - Sachs is dissing the old neoliberalism because he is selling us the latest brand.
Who can resist a pied piper story? It’s all about tuning in to the music; her history lesson goes back years; highly recommended.
She finishes with:
" It is critical to watch him and teach yourself to detect the tricks . There are a lot of tricksters, and you need to be able to identify them if you want to navigate the dangerous shoals we are going through and make it to the other side."