Another reason to see the Starmer-led entity in Paedominster as the ex-Labour party (leaving a substantial tranche of the British electorate effectively disenfranchised in P’minster). It scarcely matters whether Starmer is actually a formally-inducted agent of GCHQ or not, since he acts like one in any case.
Only just spotted this Cook piece (via MoonofAlabama, for which thanks bernhard!). It does help to make even clearer, though, that ‘sir’ Starmer is very much a well-entrenched asset of the English-raj class, and their pro-zionistan control of Brit parliamentary politics.
The sooner the disappointed (and betrayed) Corbynite/hopeful-socialist recent joiners of the ex-Labour party quit in droves, and reduce it again to the entirely-despicable, working-class-despising, self-serving bourgeois neo-liberal rump which it has declined into, the better it will be for all who wish to see real glasnostic, egalitarian, popular democracy established - finally - in England. (Cymru and Alba continue to edge quietly in that direction; roll on the death of the ukstate…!)
Such a historic, never-yet-completed development would even make it realistically possible for British politics to deliver itself from its current cringing obeisance to the apartheid thug-entity occupying Palestine, zionistan. Clearly Starmer is entirely in thrall to it. A zionistani spy employed in his own offices, FFS! Utterly contemptible, abysmal grovelling to a bunch of racist criminals! What an arse-kisser:
2 Likes
Hear hear. Starmer is a squirming, deceitful Atlanticist above all, and the propaganda apparatus is so blatantly pro-Zionist it’s breathtaking.
Glasnostic is an interesting neologism, can you expand?
Hi Karen! During Gorbachev’s time helping to bring on the collapse of the USSR, a Russian word much heard in Western media was ‘glasnost’, which was usually rendered in English as ‘open-ness’ or ‘transparent government’. I happen to think that that’s a damn good idea everywhere. So I grabbed the word, and added the suffix - ‘ic’ - to make it into an adjective. I always add it as one of the descriptor adjectives to the sort of democracy I dream of: egalitarian, proportional, glasnostic, responsible and responsive democracy; government strictly as the servant of ALL the people; the sort that’s never happened in Britain since about five or six thousand years ago, and is yet to be re-established here in modern times… 
Ok. I remember Gorby and glasnost well (1962 vintage) but had forgotten which was which. The other ‘which’ being perestroika… restructuring… definitely something of a dodgy area currently, great reset and all that.
Maybe the word democracy is due for a refit since really it only ever meant rule by some people, then came to mean ‘majority rule’, but now seems to mean whatever the gangsters in charge want it to mean. Skipping out a few of the steps along the way.
Another very very slippery term is “freedom” which tends to sit in the same bag of tricks as democracy. Colour revolutions ahoy…
1 Like