Jacinda Ardern: the woman is thoroughly repulsive in this 60 sec clip (covid)
She seems to be a pure Blairite (from the info I can find on her).
And this repulsive clip does indeed indicate that she has the pure authoritarian instincts of Blairites.
And Chomsky endorses this brand of fascism.
New Zealand, similar population to Scotland but has 1/400 of the deaths (only 26) but bringing in forced vaccination on the back of it.
Disappointing if she is like Blair - a repeat of the Blair experience.
Awful sanctimonious vicious person, all rainbows, huggy-feely rhetoric, and endless empathy for the gender confused, but no hesitation in wielding state power to serve neoliberal agenda. So: mini-Blair in every significant respect. The two-maskers adore her.
Ilsa Koch. Or should that be âKichâ, kiwi-style?
I didnâ't hear this, but a similar discussion has taken place here, with the popular media taking the worst position. Someone on Ch 7 suggested those refusing vaccination should be denied social security. We also have 'two maskers" - great one Karen!
The latest here is that people under 50 shouldnât have the AZ vaccine, which they admit would be more dangerous than getting the now eliminated virus, but instead young women in particular should have the Pfizer shot!! Not one single mention in any media of any danger, leave alone deaths from Pfizer, which everyone now thinks is the best and only kept from us because itâs more expensive. And the Israelis all had it, so must be OK. (actually that makes me wonder if it IS OK - or if they just got saline, or a strain with a different bar codeâŚ
But yesterday I had a letter of scepticism published in my local paper, pointing out that the relative risk HERE was in favour of having no vaccination at all, unless heading overseas, partly because by the time we able to travel again the current vaccine probably wonât work against new strains. All friends just say - "but weâll have to have it, as I want to visit my relys etc⌠over a barrel, with feet sticking out
Just one point here though - Ardern is only talking about workers in hotel quarantine and border security, who are the only ones who might have contact with positive cases. In countries that have eliminated the virus like NZ an OZ, the whole focus is on these places, like the only door into the prison complex; in that sense itâs justified.
Eliminated the virus, or turned down the tests?
Perhaps both Karen! I donât understand how they can do 500,000 tests over six weeks and find NOT ONE positive case, because itâs statistically impossible and scientifically impossible - even if they turn down the tests to <25 cycles. However, I do believe the virus is actually eradicated, because there simply are no cases appearing anywhere in the country not connected directly to cases in returning travellers shut in quarantine. But noone ever thinks this is at all odd, merely saying what a fantastic job people have done in keeping the monster away. Even when it was happening it wasnât happening.
But now we are consumed with how we are going to vaccinate all the people under 50 with the Pfizer vaccine that needs -70âC storage - not acknowledging or even understanding that people under 50 should never be vaccinated against this disease of the old and sick, and that anyone who is at risk can take HCQ if they are worried.
Incidentally, I believe that in most populous parts of the UK herd immunity has been reached, which is why the cases have fallen off a cliff; it has little to do with the vaccinations. Do you have any data to support this idea, or have heard it discussed? Thatâs what I tell people here when they say âhow good it is to be here in OZ, and not in the UKâ - as we are just as susceptible to the âpandemicâ we never had as we were a year ago, despite losing $500 Billion in income.
Doesnât make sense that Oz has âeradicatedâ the virus/exosome/whatever, D. Has the Australasian archipelago exempted itself from global wind patterns? If not, then youâve had the visitation too, and youâve achieved community immunity pretty quickly, to the point that itâs now endemic, and not causing any severe outbreak, nor even much in the way of noticeable symptoms, as it appears - as all previous experience and past good science on the patterns of epidemics would predict. Could be the benign effects of all that sunlight. A text-book study in how vitamin D suppresses respiratory illnesses effectively? Naturally no-one is going to know what the status really is if everyoneâs using the PCR nonsense - and remaining hypnotised by the TDS propaganda.
The whole idiot story that you report from there suggests rather that âyourâ pocket-pols and mediawhores are unusually deeply mired in the Westâs global rackets hole, run from the Swamp and the City. But we already knew that about Oz, of course. Par for the course, I suppose. I donât envy you. The scamdemic panic seems even worse there than it is in Britain.
Not so fast there RG. I think, given the way this virus spreads, itâs entirely possible that it has been eradicated from Oz. The same thing happened to the original flavour SARS and we could have done it tooâŚ
Given the way it - like all of them - spreads, P? As air-plankton? The cloud-cuckoo-technocratâs idea of eradication just doesnât stand up in that situation. Not unless Australasia really can isolate itself hermetically from the Earthâs air-circulation patterns. The real âeradicationâ is reduction to endemic-background status, with widespread new items installed, by essential prior contact with the pathogen, in the immune-system libraries of a critical mass of the populace; aka herd immunity.
You may hypothesise that the prior contact is with malign viruses; or you may hypothesise that itâs by contact with essentially-necessary, useful, and not particularly malign exosomes, carrying essential information on the wind, in the ancient evolutionary way. But either way, we have to get the memo in order to install the new items in our immune library.
Either AA has already quietly achieved the necessary mass immunity, behind and despite of all the maundering WHO-driven twittery of the AA pols, or itâs still yet to be had, because the AA populace have had insufficient exposure to achieve that benign end-state.
If so, look out for the near future, when they finally have to go through the natural, normal process of earning it. A populace not already immunised - naturally - always seems to have that job to do to get out of it all on the other side in good condition. And there are always casualties, amongst those whom bad life-style, or simple decrepit old age, have rendered vulnerable. Thatâs just life and its inevitabilities - against which the witless narcissist technocrats fulminate and plot, so uselessly: âOur aim is to abolish all sickness, and - especially - death!â Riiiiiiight! 
Given the complete absence of any reliable test for the infection - apart from clinical symptoms in palpably-unwell individuals - how does anyone really know the immune status of the AA populace? As the last of Kochâs Postulates affirms, the proof of the pudding is in the eating: when a known sample of the pathogen (critical proviso!) attempts to infect an individual, does s/he get sick; or slightly sick at least, whilst s/he deals with the incoming message and writes the new immune-system code? Or not? In the case of a herd-immune populace, of course, the upshot is ânotâ. Or not soâs youâd notice, at least, over and above the minor damn-nuisance of a cold. The codeâs already there and, as soon as it detects the incoming message, it responds with a vigorous: âOi you! Been there, done that! Thanks but no thanks! 'Byeeeee!â
But not all pathogens spread the same way, RG. And the fact remains that SARS was eradicated from the face of the planet. The virus most likely to be mistaken for this oneâŚ
If our health service wasnât run by psychopaths and laissez faire capitalist tossers, SARS-The-Return would have been similarly eradicated.
Cheers
Have you interviewed all the air-plankton beings, P? And youâre telling me thereâs not a single SARS-the-original amongst them?
I just donât believe anything much ever gets âeradicatedâ by human agency. Thatâs one of the many things weâre simply not up to, despite our ineffable narcissism. Whatâs always happened, it seems, is that all the ills which fail to âeradicateâ the whole of humankind fall back eventually into an endemic balance with us: the old ecological principle of dynamic balances of all the participants. Sometimes perturbed by newcomers to whom the rest of us are unused. But that always plays out as a brief rise in death-rates, with vulnerable candidates soon thinned to insignificance as a playground for the newbie, and with mutants quickly developing which are inherently - by natural selection - less lethal, because that gives them a better chance of not running out of candidates.
I imagine thatâs whatâs really happened with SARS1, and any other supposedly âeradicatedâ pathogens. Itâs their acquired low-lethality which allows them to linger unnoticed - only to re-appear later in history when conditions allow, to teach us not to be too uppityâŚ
I expect the current not-particularly-impressive SARS to follow the same well-proven playbook. Indeed I - and a whole lot of others, by default - am betting my own life on precisely that strategy: stay fit, stay bolstered by well-proven helpers (like C and D), and, without any other tactics needed, wait for the newbie to sort itself back into the endemic background; which itâs doing, i think, even though this natural process has been just slightly fecked-up by the hysterically-inappropriate response of âour mastersâ - driven on of course by criminal shysters on the make; the faucigatesoid psychopathic-criminal rabble.
I confess I donât know of other ways than the flowing around of the air-plankton to spread viruses/exosomes. By actual contact I suppose. But then, how did the pathogens get to their contact position, if not by air-transport? Other vectors may exist, water-transport, I suppose. But even so, I canât see them being huge, compared to the air-plankton flow. Certainly not enough to influence largely the ancient sequence of acute-to-endemic accommodation of new players in the game.
My intuition right now is that this taming sequence is already well along with SARS-COV2, and we only have to endure the psychosâ criminal efforts for a short while more, before it becomes too evident to be denied any longer that the - alleged - âpandemicâ is over. This Summer, I imagine, as the plebs simply refuse in critical-mass numbers - as we already are - to carry on with the bollocks, and the psychos and their servants in politics and media concede that this scam has been milked dry, and quietly drop it, to consolidate whatever fascistic gains they really have made.
Thatâs the real fight now, of course: to off their passports and universal injections; absolutely not for our benefit, but to make us into more efficiently-milkable, profitable cattle for the gics. And - quite possibly - for enforced population reduction, to thin out the herd a fair bit. Though as Iâve hinted before, I think thatâs another thing that hom-sap simply isnât up to. Good job the ancient natural population-balancing processes are coming into play spontaneously now, it seems - just as TLTG projected, in 1971!