5 Filters

Ivor Chudov is perplexed

Populations falling; Telegraph interviews depopulation activist Prof. Sarah Harper, who seems thrilled.
They don’t mention her W.E.F. work.

UK Population Collapse “Good for the Planet,” WEF Adviser Prof. Sarah Harper Explains

Population collapse was a conspiracy theory earlier, but is now “good for us”

Professor Sarah Harper](UK Population Collapse "Good for the Planet," WEF Adviser Prof. Sarah Harper Explains)

What’s her angle? He’s genuinely puzzled.

There’s an obvious WEF angle to this, he realizes, but he also reckons population reductions in rich countries will need to be filled by migrants, he says - who will use up the same resources as those who they replace.

Is he missing the Occam’s razor?

The WEF’s plans depend on digital currency and restrictions trampled in via vaccine passports - which were a planned thing BEFORE Covid.

Why are populations falling?
Something beginning with V?

So…rising vaccine deaths would be a problem for the master plan, wouldn’t they?

Chudov knows this, of course.
A few days ago he posted this:

Excess deaths in Canada (and the US, UK and other big European economies) have been high since 2021. Nine-sigma events, ie normally impossible.

I find it hard to believe Chudov, would have missed this angle. He could give us excess deaths by country and probably age group.

He asks his readers what they think.
I think most of them are decoyed by the migrants angle.

Look at the Telegraph headline again

UK birth slump dubbed ‘good for planet’ as number of babies born hits 20-year low
Birth rate slump in West will address overconsumption, former government adviser says

Let’s not talk about death hikes - birth slumps sounds much nicer.
We’re gonna be saved!

See if theres any more of this ‘lucky break’ angle as the emerging (emerged) issue of excess deaths wriggles it’s entire body out of the mainstream bottle.

Cheers

Thanks @Evvy_dense for the post. I wonder if anyone records data for conception rates generally and compares data for successful pregnancies with data for unsuccessful pregnancies ( whether due to deliberate abortion or loss of the baby for any other reason) . As you say if you frame the issue as lower births without explaining why then no conclusions at all can be drawn from the numbers. The lower birth number could hide massive drops in conception ( due to all sorts of reasons including the jab!), massive increases in voluntary abortion, massive failures of pregnancies for a whole host of reasons ( including the jab!)

cheers

1 Like