5 Filters

It woz Twitter wot wun it

Elon Musk Says Twitter ‘Interfered In Elections’
https://dailycaller.com/2022/11/30/musk-twitter-elections-censorship/

Refers to the Hunter Biden laptop story

Watch the squirming over why they censored it (below), as if we didn’t know why.
30/11/22 “Elon Musk Says Twitter ‘Interfered In Elections’”

This was pre-Musk of course. Musk is now busy constructing his free speech halo.
Musk “This is a battle for the future of civilization. If free speech is lost even in America, tyranny is all that lies ahead”
Well we’ll see how far he goes with the halo. He’s making an enemy of the left, who are outraged that he’s not censoring the right.
ED

30/11/22 Former Twitter Executive Who Censored Hunter Biden Laptop Story Admits Mistake

By Bill Pan

It was a mistake for Twitter to censor the story about Hunter Biden’s laptop in the weeks leading to the 2020 presidential election, the company’s former Trust and Safety Department head said on Tuesday.

Yoel Roth, who resigned earlier this month in the wake of Elon Musk’s takeover as Twitter’s new chief executive, has been blamed for censoring a New York Post article about emails retrieved from a laptop once owned by Hunter Biden.

Those emails, according to the Post, showed a direct link then-presidential candidate Joe Biden had with his son’s dubious business dealings in China and Ukraine. Shortly after the story’s publication, Twitter not only prohibited users from sharing it, but also suspended the Post’s account for two weeks.

Users who tried to share the link to the article were greeted with a message saying, “We can’t complete this request because this link has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially harmful.” Those who tried to open the link in existing posts were also warned that it was “potentially spammy and unsafe.”

Twitter flagged the New York Post article about Hunter Biden’s laptop as potentially spammy and unsafe. (Twitter screenshot)

In his first public appearance since parting with Twitter, Roth tried to shift the blame, claiming that the story was too difficult for Twitter to verify its authenticity.

“We didn’t know what to believe. We didn’t know what was true. There was smoke,” Roth said during an interview at the Knight Foundation conference. “And ultimately for me, it didn’t reach a place where I was comfortable removing this content from Twitter.”

“It set off every single one of my finely tuned APT28 ‘hack and leak campaign’ alarm bells,” he said, referring to a notorious team of cyberspies affiliated with Russian military intelligence. “Everything about it looked like a hack and leak.”

When asked whether if it was a mistake to censor the story, Roth replied, “In my opinion, yes.”

The same reasoning has been used by former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, who told the U.S. Congress in October 2020 that the company wasn’t sure whether the materials featured in the Post story were from a hack. The story “showed the direct materials and screenshots of the materials and it’s unclear how they were obtained,” Dorsey said at that time.

Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter Inc., testifies at a hearing to examine foreign influence operations’ use of social media platforms before the Intelligence Committee at the Capitol in Washington on Sept. 5, 2018. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

Roth’s confession come as Twitter’s new leadership prepares to publicize records related to the decision.

“The Twitter Files on free speech suppression soon to be published on Twitter itself. The public deserves to know what really happened,” Elon Musk wrote on Monday. “This is a battle for the future of civilization. If free speech is lost even in America, tyranny is all that lies ahead.”

Ever since his takeover of Twitter, Musk has been repeatedly called on to disclosure on Twitter’s censorship of the Post’s story. In October, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the top Republican on the House Oversight Committee, asked that Musk provide relevant information to help the investigation into “the Biden family’s pattern of influence peddling to enrich themselves and President Biden’s involvement in these schemes.”

“As part of this investigation, Committee Republicans are reviewing the role Big Tech—including Twitter—played in supporting the Biden campaign in 2020 by suppressing certain stories implicating the Bidens,” Comer wrote in an Oct. 28 letter (pdf) to Musk.

“We believe open communication and access to information is a fundamental principle for any free people, and the American people deserve to know the reason Twitter suppressed or censored the Biden laptop story shortly before the 2020 election.”

Bill Pan is a reporter for The Epoch Times.

2 Likes

Perhaps there should be a new term of censure for this sub-class of the Woke: laptop deniers. But, seriously, what an absolute travesty. The whole Biden-Ukraine scam is so alarming. That’s both the part visible above the surface and the fact that there is, for sure, much more significant detail hidden away. Not forgetting all the minions dedicated to keeping things that way.

2 Likes

As more Twitter Files stuff gets released (having belatedly realised that James Baker was interfering with this process and presumably downplaying the relatively tame disclosures to date) a little trickle of the righteous are flouncing out.

Similar to the underwhelming Canadians who ran away from Spotify.

On the whole, this works for me. If people don’t feel safe on a platform they should feel free to leave. In the same way that telllievisions are equipped with an off switch, kicking the telly to bits (or trying to have the platform trashed) is back-to-front.

Anyway, the latest flounce was by Sur-elton John, cue collage:

3 Likes
1 Like

Thanks for posting this, LY. I have long wondered if child abuse was being kept warm as a selling point for wider measures. You frequently read of someone in court for having downloaded x thousand images or videos of child sexual abuse, but it never seems to happen that anyone producing the material - actually abusing the children - is prosecuted.

Eliminating the crimes at source before the proceeds are sent to thousands of people would go a long way towards stopping the abuse.

This is just the way you would use the power, if power was the end itself. So I’m not surprised that Twitter was uninterested, so long as it could get away with it. No-one was paying it to do that, and they have those more important pesky narrative opponents to keep down.

The only troubling thing about this theory is it doesn’t only apply to Twitter, but to the wider political sphere. “What’s in it for us?”

Well, this is - the online safety bill.:

“Abuse online” = a handy catchall - equated with reading about harm from medical policies, like damning facts about viruses and vaccines.

Oppressive goodies for the powerful - and all packaged up with keeping those children safe.

2 Likes

‘Surelton’! Sounds like the sort of fanciful name that a peri-natal-deranged mother might lumber her daughter with:

“Surelton, come in for yer tea, and bring our Keanu with ya!”

2 Likes