Compiled by commenter ‘Paul’ in Off-G’s ‘New Lockdown Announced’ article:
QUOTE:
Paul
Nov 2, 2020 12:47 AM
The role of the mainstream media and especially BBC has been a national disgrace.
Absolutely zero investigative journalism from any of them.
As this article points out no context was given by any of them about hospitalisations or deaths.
The questions the media should have been asking:
– Are you working with real data or computer models?
– If it’s a computer model can you please tell the people just how exactly you have come to these conclusions. What makes you certain you’re correct?
– As the computer model to justify the lockdown in March has been thoroughly discredited why did Sage not review that model and realise it was not fit for purpose before lockdown was put in.
If you did review the model then why did you not realise it was full of bugs and not fit for purpose?
How can anyone take you seriously after the calamitous errors you’ve already made?
– All the models produced to date since have been hysterically wrong. How can we trust that you aren’t wrong again?
– Why is Neil Ferguson still involved in producing computer models when his track record is awful? And that’s being kind.
– Your strategy is to bring in the army and test test test. Ok so let me ask a few questions.
Why is PCR being used to test people when it’s not a diagnostic tool and can’t distinguish between viral and non viral RNA?
How are you planning to perform a clinical diagnosis?
Why are amplification cycles set at 45 when in the world of evidence based medicine a cycle of over 30 is dubious and a cycle of over 40 meaningless?
– FOI requests have revealed Sars-Cov 2 has never been isolated. Can the science please show the public the evidence that the RNA being tested for belongs to this new virus?
– How is the disease COVID-19 being diagnosed?
– Show the graphs comparing last year’s hospitalisations and icu inpatients?
– Why has there been no excess deaths if you claim this virus is so prevalent
– Why is a Covid-19 death recorded on death certificates when it’s classified as a death of any cause within 28 days of a positive ‘test’ that’s not a diagnostic, with no clinical diagnosis required and no autopsy to determine cause of death
– Have Sage or anyone else done a model how a lockdown will affect the economy?
– Have you done an impact assessment on the collateral damage a lockdown will cause?
– Have you modelled how many deaths the lockdown will cause?
– Have you modelled the impact this will have on mental health?
– Question for Sage. Your minutes in March showed you want to increase the level of personal threat to everyone by using hard hitting emotional messages through the media. Why would you do that? What did you think it would achieve? Did you do a risk assessment on the impact this would have?
– Mr Whitty you told us in March only a very small amount of people would be vulnerable to this virus your telling us about. What’s changed?
– Patrick Vallance you and John Edmunds are on the record in March stating you advocated a herd immunity approach. Now you’re telling us herd immunity doesn’t work without a vaccine. Why did you lie back in March?
– The exit strategy is a vaccine. Ok so how are you certain this vaccine will provide herd immunity as you don’t have it yet?
You’ve stated antibodies don’t last long so how is a vaccine going to help?
– Vaccines have never eradicated any coronavirus before so why place so much confidence in a vaccine?
– How confident are you and show us the evidence that this vaccine when it does arrive is going to be safe and have no long term side effects?
– Professors Henegan and Gupta and many others have proved beyond all reasonable doubt that protecting the vulnerable was the evidence based medicine strategy.
You are saying no it must be a vaccine.
As both Whitty and Vallance are on the Uk vaccine board and both are connected to the pharmaceutical industry is there a conflict of interests? Do you both expect to profit from a vaccine?
Why is Imperial College London involved in modelling when they’ve also been awarded hundreds of millions of tax payers money for vaccines.
Is there a conflict of interest?
But the head nodders and parrots in the MSM have asked none of these critical questions.
Truly and utterly pathetic. Politicians, Sage and MSM are the virus.
UNQUOTE