5 Filters

George Monbiot’s excuses for not speaking out loudly in defence of Assange simply won’t wash - Jonathan Cook

H/t Ingwe at Craig Murray’s blog:

A very, very telling article - one might even call it a killer blow.

Here is just a bit of it:

No, Monbiot told his followers about none of these developments or about much more that has emerged over the past four weeks. Instead he offered two cowardly excuses for why he has remained so mealymouthed at the worst assault on press freedom in living memory.

The first was that the Assange extradition hearing apparently isn’t important enough. It is simply “one of hundreds of crucial issues” and “compared to say, soil loss, it’s way down my list”.

No one can doubt that Monbiot rightly takes environmental issues extremely seriously. But he doesn’t just tweet and write about the environment. There are many others issues, entirely unconnected to the environment and of which he appears to know almost nothing, that he regularly writes about.

One will suffice as illustrative. For the past two years Monbiot has dedicated a great deal of time and energy – time and energy he has refused to expend on defending Assange and press freedom – to attack those who have questioned claims by the US and UK intelligence services that the Syrian government under Bashar Assad carried out a chemical weapons attack in Douma in April 2018. The supposed attack provided the pretext for the US to launch a bombing attack on Syria – an example of a supreme international crime, according to the Nuremberg principles.

[…]

Absurd argument
There are plenty of reasons, therefore, to criticise Monbiot for his smearing of the Douma sceptics and the OPCW whistleblowers. But I am not interested here in revisiting the Douma episode. The point I am making relates to Assange.
In asserting that he doesn’t have time to defend Assange, Monbiot is implicitly arguing that opposing the current all-out war by the US on journalism is a lower priority than his smearing of the OPCW whistleblowers; that bullying and silencing Douma sceptics is one of those “hundreds of crucial issues” more important than preventing Assange from spending the rest of his life in jail, and more important than saving investigative journalism from this gravest of assaults by the US.

(I find Monbiot’s behaviour extremely disturbing. It brings into very sharp focus the problem with “liberalism” that I still haven’t got to grips with; here Cook puts his finger right on it.)

1 Like

A killer blow indeed. I was just having a discussion with a friend a couple of days ago, and I mentioned in an offhand comment that I think Monbiot is fatally compromised as a journalist, and I got back a look of complete surprise.

He’s still the poster child for a lot of eco-conscious, well meaning people. What a shame he can’t seem to break out of the fig-leaf role that he’s internalised…

There was a time, a few years back now, when I remember discussion around the possibility of a truly independent media, to pull the likes of Monbiot and others out of the MSM, and free them to truly write what they believed.

Sadly it just never got off the ground… Having a billionaire handy seems like a prerequisite for a newspaper to make it…

Having a body of law which insisted that news media must stay out of the hands of billionaires, and be properly funded by non-commercial means might help, like much of the NHS is still, and, at one time, the BBC was. Certainly something that I’d write into any state constitution that I was helping to draft.

1 Like