Former Pfizer Employee and Whistleblower Reveals ‘Horrifying’ New Patent That Will Connect Vaxxed People to AI-Powered Algorithms And Track Where You Go and Who You Are With
Article:
Video:
Interview with Karen Kingston:
Vaccine Patents to Track Who You Associate with, When You Go To Church And Your Social Credit Score
Isn’t it easier follow them using a compass, after the vaccine has turned them into magnets?
(Poor PP got stuck to his fridge yesterday. He couldn’t get free, and had to call the fire brigade.)
I’m trying to get in my fridge.
The patent that Karen Kingston is talking about is here
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20210082583A1/en
You’ll need to magnify to see this part
Applied for in March, granted in August.
Classifications
G16H50/80 ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics, e.g. flu"
The flowchart says
Receiving information about subject
Analyzing information
Generating score
Optionally allocating in score group
Vaccinating according to score/group score
It does seem to connect the idea of monitoring and vaccinating remotely according to a score.
Of course this means other medical treatments would be possible. And two way communication, natch.
Kingston connects this with Blinken’s OECD speech. This could be a lot of blather, but I can see why this comes across as creepy - arch capitalists developing systems to address inequality! Everyone just put on these socialist handcuffs, and…you’ll see - trust us!
What’s not so clear is where this is at. I haven’t watched everything they’re telling us here. The last ‘dot’ could be obvious, or could require imagination.
Here is Kingston’s other patent mentioned:
“A composite magnetic nanoparticle drug delivery system provides targeted controlled release chemotherapies for cancerous tumors and inflammatory diseases. The magnetic nanoparticle includes a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer, a magnetic nanoparticle, the biological targeting agent human serum albumin, and a therapeutic pharmaceutical composition. …”
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120265001A1/en
Further down it explains that conventional treatment for these two named conditions is limited by access. Presumably it could just as easily release other treatments.
Thanks Rich, as usual 
You’ll need to magnify to see this part
No you just click on twhere it says images(13), and you get 13 slides.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20210082583A1/en
Click through them all and you get a feel for what is intended!
" Methods and systems of prioritizing treatments, vaccination, testing and/or activities while protecting the privacy of individuals"
But your privacy is protected! At the cost of ceding control over what you might have wanted to be private about.
You’re welcome Ev, also as usual and thanks for all your summaries and analyses over quite some considerable time now I think. Cheers! 
I read this as suggesting that people would be connected to a tracking infrastructure electronically through some nanoparticle trickery. Was it the intention of the headline writer to insinuate that?
Not to downrate the sinisterness, necessarily, but the patent is really glorified track and trace, and is about connecting digital IDs via devices (“device A encounters device B” ), irrespective of vaxx status. In fact an application suggested for the tech seems to be identifying people to prioritise for jabbing. I have a fair bit more time for this concept than indiscriminate “get it, or else” compulsion but the patent application is quite a few months old already.
The use of language is very unhelpful, in particular the phrase “embodiments of the invention”. No one could be blamed for assuming this means the technology itself would be ‘embodied’ (in the sense of put inside people). They simply mean ways in which the invention might take shape.
Karen’s Fect Chack score: Shaking My Head.
This is exactly what I thought too. Although there is a weird bit about meds being delivered automatically based on the likelihood of getting infected.
Technology eh? I’ll let you all know if I start getting weird apps trying to give me Pro-Vaxx messages…
In track and trace you are only tracked in certain places, this looks like kind of everywhere, or perhaps everywhere there are people…
Prioritization for treatment, and then treatment - not sure if the idea is you get the choice.
Assessing your ‘behaviour’, your profession, the health of everyone you’ve passed by. Continuously (or until they run out of printed circuits or energy).
System may select subjects for treatment anonymously.
Subject carries around all the devices.
A bit weird?
Is all this massive intrusion to tell you to get a vaccine? Looks more like a continuous vaccine, determined by technology? Where would people fit in who didn’t want to be part of it? It’s inconceivable they won’t find barriers everywhere, surely?
There’s 70 pages of these variations or options (first few pages below).
Cheers
ED
What is claimed is:
An anonymized method of treating subjects against an infectious disease caused by a pathogen
devices/ proximity tracking circuitry for each of said subjects
generating a score reflecting a propensity for proximity
generating for said particular electronic device a prioritization of treatment based on said score; and
treating said particular subject according to said prioritization.
…
a. a plurality of electronic devices configured to be carried around by said subjects and configured with instructions to:
i. generate an ID comprising for each said electronic device;
ii. when in proximity of another such electronic device, one or both of transmit said ID or an indication thereof to said another electronic device and receive an ID or indication thereof from said another electronic device;
iii. generating, a score based on a plurality of such received IDs;
iv. receiving information from a server;
v. displaying relevant treatment instructions to said subjects based on said received information;
…
a. physical proximity data received by means of electronic positioning data of said subject;
b. a distance indicating sensor which indicates physical proximity of the location of a device in relation to the location of said another device; and
c. historical location data.
The system according to claim 19, wherein said at least one server or said electronic devices comprise instructions to determine a treatment prioritization based on said likelihood.
The system according to claim 23, wherein said determine a treatment prioritization further comprises one or more of:
a. generating a score component based on a nature of a location where said physical proximity data is related;
b. generating a score component comprising health data of the subject of one or both electronic devices;
c. generating a score component comprising a profession of the subject of one or both electronic devices;
d. generating a score component reflecting relative health risk to said subject if said subject contracts said pathogen; and
e. generating a score component reflecting damage to society if said subject contracts said pathogen.
The system according to claim 23, wherein when said physical proximity data is related to a location that is either indoors or in a closed space, then said predicted likelihood of said subject of transmitting said pathogen increases by a factor of between about 10 times to about 100 times.
The system according to claim 19, further comprising a vaccination server which allocates vaccinations for a corona virus according to said displayed treatment information.
The system according to claim 27, wherein said server comprises a simulation module configured to perform one or both of:
(a) predict the effect of vaccination on disease spread;
(b) predict the effect of an ID transmission probability on distinguishing between subjects who contact mainly subjects in a same subpopulation.
a. providing an electronic device with proximity tracking circuitry for each of said subjects;
b. generating an ID for each said electronic device;
c. at a proximity event, when a particular said electronic device of a particular said subject is in proximity of one or more other of said electronic devices, one or both of transmitting said ID or an indication thereof to said one or more other devices and receiving an ID or indication thereof from said one or more other devices, by said particular electronic device;
d. generating, by said particular electronic device a score reflecting a propensity for proximity, according to a plurality of received IDs;
e. generating for said particular electronic device a prioritization of treatment based on said score; and
f. treating said particular subject according to said prioritization.
The method according to claim 1, wherein said generating an ID comprises generating an ID having fewer than 100,000 potential values.
The method according to claim 2, wherein said generating an ID comprises generating a unique ID and also generating said ID as a portion of said unique ID.
The method according to claim 1, further comprising changing said ID periodically.
The method according to claim 1, further comprising generating a second ID and transmitting said second ID or indication thereof together with said ID.
The method according to claim 5, wherein said transmitting a second ID is carried out only at a fraction of said proximity events.
The method according to claim 6, wherein said transmitting comprises transmitting also second IDs previously received from others of said electronic devices.
The method according to claim 6, comprising generating an indication of closeness of a population met by said electronic device based on said received second IDs.
The method according to claim 1, wherein said score depends on an estimation of propensity of proximity of said one or more other devices.
The method according to claim 1, wherein said generating said score comprises counting the number of received IDs.
The method according to claim 10, wherein said counting comprises counting unique IDs.
The method according to claim 10, wherein said counting comprises counting IDs with a weighted parameter, said weighted parameter is generated by analyzing said exchanged second IDs.
The method according to claim 1, wherein said generating for said particular device comprises transmitting said score to a server and generating said prioritization on said server.
The method according to claim 13, wherein generating said prioritization comprises comparing scores by different ones of said electronic devices.
The method according to claim 1, wherein said generating for said particular device comprises generating said prioritization on said particular electronic device.
The method according to claim 15, wherein said generation comprises receiving form a server a list or a function indication prioritization according to score.
The method according to claim 1, comprising displaying treatment instructions on said particular electronic device based on said generated prioritization.
The method of claim 1, wherein said pathogen comprises a corona virus and wherein said treatment comprises a vaccination and wherein said prioritization is used to select subjects at greater risk of transmitting the pathogen during a pandemic to be vaccinated sooner than subjects less likely to transmit the pathogen.
A system for anonymously selecting subjects for treatment against an infectious disease caused by a pathogen, comprising:
a. a plurality of electronic devices configured to be carried around by said subjects and configured with instructions to:
i. generate an ID comprising for each said electronic device;
ii. when in proximity of another such electronic device, one or both of transmit said ID or an indication thereof to said another electronic device and receive an ID or indication thereof from said another electronic device;
iii. generating, a score based on a plurality of such received IDs;
iv. receiving information from a server;
v. displaying relevant treatment instructions to said subjects based on said received information;
b. at least one server comprising a memory and a plurality of modules; said memory comprising instructions for:
vii. sending to said plurality of electronic devices information usable by a circuitry in said plurality of electronic devices to display said relevant treatment instructions,
wherein said at least one server or said electronic devices comprise instructions to generate a prediction of likelihood of a subject transmitting said pathogen, based on a score of the subject.
The system according to claim 19, wherein said information comprises one or more of subject specific information.
The system according to claim 19, wherein said information comprises general information usable by a plurality of subjects and devices thereof.
The system according to claim 19, wherein said server is configured with instructions to receive anonymous scores for a plurality of said electronic devices and use said received scores to generate said general information, said electronic devices configured to use said general information to determine a relative treatment priority for their respective subjects.
The system according to claim 19, wherein said electronic devices comprises a proximity-detecting module using one or more of:
a. physical proximity data received by means of electronic positioning data of said subject;
b. a distance indicating sensor which indicates physical proximity of the location of a device in relation to the location of said another device; and
c. historical location data.
The system according to claim 19, wherein said at least one server or said electronic devices comprise instructions to determine a treatment prioritization based on said likelihood.
The system according to claim 23, wherein said determine a treatment prioritization further comprises one or more of:
a. generating a score component based on a nature of a location where said physical proximity data is related;
b. generating a score component comprising health data of the subject of one or both electronic devices;
c. generating a score component comprising a profession of the subject of one or both electronic devices;
d. generating a score component reflecting relative health risk to said subject if said subject contracts said pathogen; and
e. generating a score component reflecting damage to society if said subject contracts said pathogen.
The system according to claim 23, wherein when said physical proximity data is related to a location that is either indoors or in a closed space, then said predicted likelihood of said subject of transmitting said pathogen increases by a factor of between about 10 times to about 100 times.
The system according to claim 19, further comprising a vaccination server which allocates vaccinations for a corona virus according to said displayed treatment information.
The system according to claim 27, wherein said server comprises a simulation module configured to perform one or both of:
(a) predict the effect of vaccination on disease spread;
(b) predict the effect of an ID transmission probability on distinguishing between subjects who contact mainly subjects in a same subpopulation.
The system of claim 19, wherein said electronic devices are configured to transmit a second ID and previously received second IDs, at a probability of less than 10% and using said received second IDs to generate said score.
The system of claim 19, wherein said transmitted ID is a non-unique ID having fewer possible values than 10% of the number of said devices.
Key proviso, E! And likely to crash the whole stupid megalomanic idiocy a lot sooner than these loons imagine, I think…
Consider this for example: Tim Morgan’s blog number 213.
I put up a general link to his SEEDS website, because the previous blog posts are also well worth an extended look, as is his overall theory that economics is emphatically NOT about playing ridiculous games with monetary growthforever delusions, but is inescapably a matter of real energy accounting: A Black Swan that - right now! - is coming home to roost with vengeance in its beak: “Ignore ‘The Limits To Growth’, and this is what you get, suckers!”
Yes. Lots and lots of numbered paragraphs. All of which I read the first time.
The persons submitting the patent application appear to have tried to cram in every possible idea (though perhaps not “smart kitchen sinks”?) as some wanky way of trying to protect every aspect of their intellectual property (read “crap ideas”). It looks like Disinfo but maybe they really thought this was a smart way to proceed, advised by some Saul Goodman type?
It’s the same “never mind the quality, get a load of this!!” vexatious bollox that so many covid skeptics adopt, as I have highlighted before, of chucking in every ludicrous claim they can on the assumption that “some of this will stick”. Like the grammes and grammes of Graphene in every dose blah blah blah. Like the 51 posts so far today puked out by the Minotti/Yeadon Telegram group. Like the recent discovery of the microorganism hydra somethingorother in a vaccine dose.
Not just wasting people’s time and energy but exactly playing into the hands of the fact checkers and rebuttal units (who are paid to spend time on this). It’s quite likely aimed at demoralising opposition by tying them/us up in knots.
The same barrack room barrister impulse is what drives pissed-off employees who should have complained years ago into finally cracking and compiling a 15 page Grievance, cackling “get out of that one”, and then wondering why no one takes them seriously.
Even if none of the above were credible, if I could muster up the filing fee etc what would prevent me lodging a patent application for a time machine made of Mills & Boon paperbacks stuck together with cornflour? It doesn’t make the application in any way likely to be translated into actuality.
See, for example
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20030075208A1/en
And…
Well I was answering the first point about it being dull and boring. I guess patents would try to grab idea space. It might be wild, but it’s been pushed on the mainstream by the DoD.
Gates is also into this kind of stuff. Unlike Partridge (lol), he and the DoD have already got the dosh.
I wonder whether Gates will prioritize spraying nano-particles into the atmosphere to block the sun’s rays, or brand new surveillance and med delivery tech?
It’s a brave new (techno-utopian) world we’re heading for all right.
Cheers
That’s a great article Rhis. Maybe worth its own thread!
Thanks for sharing
It does look good but CBS site and Brave AdBlocker are at daggers drawn so practically unreadable.
I thought Mr Gates was focusing on locust burgers at the moment…?