No more juries? Looks like it. Loads more here…
2 Likes
Never mind the juries. It’s the corruption of our entire system of ‘government’. Courts, police, parliament, and of course the ‘health’ services. There is too much in there to pick out.
I intend to share this with all my still asleep friends, although I don’t hold out much hope. Andrew Bridgen really is a brave and honorable man.
Thanks for posting
1 Like
I sort of agree in principle @PatB , but some things stand out, by revealing particular intent. This can take corruption to a sinster level. Abolition of jury trials - no doubt when it suits the establishment, as in political trials - is one of these.
No doubt in the future the population will still be thrown some meaty, democracy-affirming show events, as in the execution ceremonies in A Handmaid’s Tale.
Talking of total corruption, it just so happens…the trial of Natalie Strecker is underway in Jersey, charged in relation to peaceful behaviour that is wholly unrelated to terrorism, that is being called terrorism.
As so often, Craig Murray performs such a good public service in travelling there and relaying the key issues.
Firstly (emphasis added),
“The prosecution is directed from London and Alison Morgan KC, senior Treasury counsel (UK government lawyer) is seated beside the local prosecuting counsel, openly puppeteering him every step of the way.”
Eh - wtf?
Murray continues:
"So why has the UK government chosen Jersey to prosecute a local pacificst mother whose statements provide possibly the weakest case of support for terrorism that has ever been heard in any court in the western world?
The answer is that here in Jersey there is no jury. "
The system is judge-led, as Murray explains, adding that no jury would convict on this “self-evidently vindictive nonsense”.
Murray then relays the puppeteering he saw in action:
"The prosecution explicitly stated, and the judge notably intervened to make sure that evrybody understood, that it is the offence of supporting terrorism to state that the Palestinians have the right to armed resistance in international law.
Judge John Saunders interrupted the prosecution to ask whether they were saying that he would be guilty of support for terrorism if, in a lecture, he told an international law class that Palestinians have the right to armed resistance in international law.
After some kerfuffle when faced with such an awkward question, the prosecution replied that yes, it could be the offence to tell law students that.
I should point out, at risk of dying in jail, that the Palestinians are beyond doubt an occupied people in international law, and equally beyond doubt an occupied people have the right of armed resistance.
To state that the Palestinians have the right of armed resistance in international law is not in the least controversial as a statement of law. A few zionist nutters would try to differ, but 95% of international lawyers on this planet would agree."
By logical extension, Murray also indicates that this means that law lecturers must be breaking the same law in citing and explaining international law to their students. As effectively the judge himself had clarified.
The implications of this (bullshit) are immense.
The government can write out International Law at a stroke - without even ever considering it in the first place.
If courts agree to this they will agree to bypass other laws. But the bypass will be mainly in the political area.
ED
The Terrifying Case of Natalie Strecker
@Evvy_dense You may be right. However, I have trouble elevating the loss of juries above the deliberate eugenics of the convid jab, or the absolute loss of politicians duty to their constituents, or the total politicisation of the police.
The only “democracy-affirming show event” I look forward to is Nuremberg 2!
1 Like
More from Andrew Bridgen, on chemtrails this time.
Earlier this year I was on a four hour flight across Europe flying at 30,000 feet when I saw through a porthole diagonally opposite me a CT plane flying towards us pouring out the grey poison. The truly awesome amount of crap billowing out from the plane was mind-blowing at that proximity. The CT plane flew over the top of us and I then watched it for a few seconds disappearing at an angle on my side of the aircraft with thick black (!) smoke pouring out of the back of it. I don’t think anyone else on the plane saw it. A bit later on I described the experience to the steward. I thought there was a reasonable chance that during his perhaps tens of thousands of miles of flying time he might have seen a CT plane. Well he hadn’t seen one. He kept going on about how they were taught about this in training and that it’s just ice crystals. It took me a while to get him to understand that what I was on about wasn’t ice crystals! Later on when we were disembarking from the plane the steward stopped me and said he’d asked the pilots about this and all they said was that if this was really going on it would involve a top secret department in the government. Well no shit Sherlock! IMO there’s no way that passenger jet pilots don’t see this phenomenon on at least some occasions considering their view and location of their windows in the cockpit.
https://x.com/nogps1/status/1995686316487704600?t=8gRi6dc4VjMRGaHHznPYAA&s=09