…because the jab 'raises risk of cardiac death by 84%
It’s a perfectly legit study design from the admittedly rebellious state of Florida, using a method, a self-controlled case series, developed for vaccines. The idea is to compare people only with themselves, in two different time periods. In this case the comparison was cardiac deaths within 28 days following a Covid-19 mRNA vaccine, versus cardiac death in the 5 months or so after that. This eliminates confounding and bias that is due to people’s differing ages, health status etc.
If you want a laugh as Chudov suggests, or if you merely want to see how only versions of a story come up that are slanted to suit the vaccine narrative, put “Ladapo Florida study” into some well known search engines, and see how the story is presented.
The biggest criticism screamed seems to be that the study didn’t factor deaths from Covid itself into the design. However as the CHD’s Defender notes, this was mooted for contemplationin the study:
‘It also noted that the risk for both all-cause and cardiac-related deaths was “substantially higher 28 days following COVID-19 infection.”
As such, the study concluded that people should weigh the risk associated with mRNA vaccination with the risk associated with COVID-19 infection.’
The real problem isn’t the criticisms, but the screaming of them, and the prioritization of the screaming by the search engines to displace the actual news.
ED
There’s now so many blokes in France dropping dead from the shots that I have a queue of lovely young women who want to shag me.
It’s a bitch being un-vaccinated.
Shakespeare was, in my opinion, not a very good poet…
Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day? Thou art more lovely and more temperate: Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May, And summer’s lease hath all too short a date: Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines, And often is his gold complexion dimmed, And every fair from fair sometime declines, By chance, or nature’s changing course untrimmed: But thy eternal summer shall not fade, Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow’st, Nor shall death brag thou wander’st in his shade, When in eternal lines to time thou grow’st, So long as men can breathe, or eyes can see, So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.
Sonnet 18 starts off brilliantly, then is loses it towards the end (it’s not easy to do this stuff). Shakespeare, of course, is one of the most brilliant playwrights who ever lived.
Poetry, on the otherhand, is much more subjective.
Do you really give a shit if Kherson is under Ukrainian control or Russian control? of course you don’t, because you are not told about the history of it all.
But you’re willing to have your children incinerated over such complete nonsense.
The different evidential angles against the shots are stacking up. But people don’t even have to be zombies to keep the faith - they just have to follow the mainstream news.
I’ve always thought that sonnet does trail off in the middle…bit of a bind as I only know about two.
I’ll just state the obvious, that poetry is very subjective.
Dear old Shakes did everything in pentametre (10 beats per line). Pentametre is supposedly the natural breath for a sentence in the English language.
I rarely, if ever, write in pents. I nearly always write in tetrametre (8 beats per line). Tets are much more difficult to write, but I won’t bore you with all this poetry bollox.
Point is, if you listen closely to the MSM English language propaganda it’s all in pentametre, even though they are just talking heads and it has nothing directly to do with poetry.