Hi folks, this is a vital issue,imo.
Cheers
1 Like
I had a skim thought but I’m not not sure I understand what Eve’s law actually is or why it’s bad? A quick search turns up this
https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motion/46381/eves-law-and-victims-of-domestic-violence
That this House recognises that victims of domestic violence and abuse are being placed at risk when forced to give their safe address in open court in unrelated proceedings; supports Eve’s Law to address this dangerous anomaly; further supports Eve’s Marker which would red flag the personal information of a victim of abuse as confidential and highly sensitive and would ensure that the data would never be publicly disclosed unless exceptional circumstances demanded it; notes that Eve’s Law would protect victims of domestic violence in court on an unrelated matter; further notes that Eve’s Law would close an anomaly which may deter victims of domestic violence from reporting abuse; and urges the Government to introduce Eve’s Law.
What is it that I’m missing here, CJ?
Presumably this domestic violence context is the “sell” - with the devil in the detail - and the bill applies outwith the domestic setting, so not ‘as sold’.
Just my reading from the post and from the Davis article, which alleges a whole lot more.
1 Like
Sorry for the delay in responding - the problem is that Google brings up the old harmless Eve’s law proposal involving domestic abuse , but this is not the Eve’s law that Iain Davis is referring to. He uses the term “Eve’s Law” because this is what one of the claimants, Martin Hibbert , in the Richard D Hall harrassment case refers to. MH said that he hoped to see a new law named after his daughter - Eve Hibbert - to prevent the media challenging victims of crimes. In fact a new law, known as Martyn’s law after one of the victims has almost gone through Parliament and this is the law that Iain Davis’s article criticises:
The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill
https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/57234/documents/5453
Reading the court case against Richard D Hall is a revelation!
The full alternative story of the Manchester Arena Incident in 2017 is told by Richard D Hall (to the extent his material has not been the subject of injunctions following his harrassment case), Iain Davis see original link above and David Hughes’ 11 parter
Richard D Hall has sought to appeal the court decision see part1 of this latest video
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=313&part=1&gen=99
It seems as though UK Column has come under criticism for remarks they make about Richard D Hall - quite an interesting side issue. I don’t watch UKC after observing it spent long periods ignoring the genocide in Gaza! RH seems to think UKC couldn’t find time to analyse the evidence presented to them by RH or ID and wouldn’t put it out on their platform.
To go through all the material is perhaps too much for most people - but then we are still seeing 9/11 truth material decades after the event!
So my advice is to ignore the previous Eve’s law references from Google as these have nothing to do with Manchester Arena 2017 incident and subsequent events and focus on the work of the 3 people offering an alternative to the official narrative.
One thing that struck me was the amazing lack of emergency services for what is supposed to have been a slaughter of 23 and serious injury of 58 and injury of 800 others - this is analysed in ID’s free 2024 online book- the Manchester Attack.
cheers
2 Likes