Professor-Emeritus Niels Harrit is the Danish academic who was a crucial leader of the research team who demonstrated the presence of nano-thermite residues in the World Trade Centre dust, after the 2001 false-flag attack, which in turn confirmed beyond reasonable doubt that the three building collapses were controlled demolitions, and that therefore, inescapably, the whole attack simply had to be a false-flag, since such building preparations are only possible when substantial teams of highly-skilled technicians get privileged access to the buildings, over an extended period. Only in Harry Potter stories do you wave a magic wand, and the rigging of the buildings is done in seconds - “Just like that!” (h/t the late, great Tommy Cooper, )
Here, Niels shreds the credibility of the PCR test - in the deceitful way it is being used currently. (Not that the test is worthless; it is useful, for its original purposes as developed by Kary Mullis, and when it’s done honestly, as he intended. Key proviso!)
Note that Niels too condemns the current use of the test as a swindle; literally that word…
Very familiar to me at least! Prof Niels Harrit is the scientist who wrote a peer reviewed paper in which he single handedly proved that 911 was an inside job because of his discovery of military grade nano-thermite in the dust all over NYC after the 3 towers were obliterated with planted devices in the buildings.
Most of what he’s saying about the PCR test is above my head but his closing remark couldn’t be clearer:
Closing remark
To be sick is to have symptoms. If you are not sick, you are not contagious. It used to be common sense that you are healthy unless you are not.
Sense is not common anymore during the alleged Covid-19 pandemic. Now you are sick until proven healthy – and contagious by default. The vehicle for this scam is the RT-PCR test run at >35 cycles and beyond. Stop testing and survive.
Also, in the BTL comments, I found this 100% spot on 17 minute video by Reiner Fuellmich. Kill 'em Reiner!
Just reading the heading, I remembered the name but couldn’t think why. As @Rich said, it got too complicated for me, until I hit this.
"So, if 1) there exists such a thing as a singular SARS-CoV-2 virus, if 2) this virus causes serious respiratory symptoms, if 3) the virus is inoculable in VERA cells, if 4) VERA cells are a valid representation of human ditto, and if 5) the Corman-Drosten test really detects SARS-CoV-2 specifically, it MAY [the PCR “test”] have some benefit for a doctor in a clinical setting with a patient having serious respiratory symptoms to run an RT-PCR until Ct = 25 as a supplementary test.[3]
A bit far out, isn’t it?
It really boils down to the primers, their specificity and applicability at low concentrations. How can they target a fatal SARS-CoV-2 virus when its very existence remains to be demonstrated? Furthermore, the sequences of the various primers being used are found not only in ca. 100 bacteria but are also abundant in the human genome."
)