Note to Si and Everyman: I acknowledge your stance that we can actually be sure of knowing very little with any deserved certainty, outside of our own lying-eyes direct personal experience; and even there, only with caution.
To cope with this reality when trying to look at the doings of the great world, I’m forced to use a percentage system for guestimating a source’s reliability. In Eva’s case, I consider that she’s earned a very high percentage trust rating. I didn’t see any anti-referendum, anti-enosis remarks, so it could be that she’s selecting only the positive speakers. But look at them! If you can’t trust these obviously normal, reasonable, truth-telling plebs, then who will you trust?
