I threw in the Hammond link to balance the Chudov riposte. FWIW I think Hammond is making a mistake. It’s not his duty to argue the ins and outs of viruses. The thing-called-covid is responsible for hugely damaging policies and vaccines. It exists, even if it was invented. And whatever it is, the thing-called-covid responds to early treatment, as shown in hundreds of studies. Early treatment advocates are trying to reduce all this damage - the isolation of the thing-called-covid (or it’s virus/novirus) isn’t needed for this effort, so I don’t know why it has to follow the activists around who are trying to oppose the harm. Should this ‘No virus’ challenge not be issued to the virologists? It seems to me it’s really them (they?) the novirusers have the issue with.