5 Filters

Dr. Mike Yeadon: RED ALERT: STARTING SEPTEMBER 6th All Children Ages 12 to 15 to be Injected with COVID-19 Shots in UK Schools With or Without Parental Consent

Covid
#1

RED ALERT: All Children Ages 12 to 15 to be Injected with COVID-19 Shots in UK Schools With or Without Parental Consent – By Former Vice President & Chief Science Officer Of Pfizer Dr. Mike Yeadon

August 26, 2021 by Infinite

– ALERT: All Children Ages 12 to 15 to be Injected with COVID-19 Shots in UK Schools With or Without Parental Consent

ALERT ALERT ALERT

ALL PARENTS IN U.K. WITH CHILDREN AGED 12 – 15 years

by Dr. Mike Yeadon

I’ve just been informed via someone senior in the vaccination authorities that they will begin VACCINATING ALL SCHOOL CHILDREN AGED 12 – 15 years old STARTING SEPTEMBER 6th 2021.

WITH OR WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT.

Children are at no measurable risk from SARS-CoV-2 & no previously healthy child has died in U.K. after infection. Not one.

The vaccines are NOT SAFE. The USA reporting system VAERS is showing around 13,000 deaths in days to a few weeks after administration. A high % occur in the first 3 days. Around 70% of serious adverse events are thromboembolic in nature (blood clotting- or bleeding-related).

We know why this is: all of the gene-based vaccines cause our bodies to manufacture the virus spike protein & that spike protein triggers blood coagulation.

The next most common type of adverse events are neurological.

Death rates per million vaccinations are running everywhere at around 60X more than any previous vaccine.

Worse, thromboembolic events such as pulmonary embolisms, appear at over 400X the typical low rate after vaccination.

These events are serious, occur at a hideously elevated level & are at least as common in young people as in elderly people. The tendency is that younger people are having MORE SEVERE adverse events than older people.

There is literally no benefit whatsoever from this intervention. As stated, the children are unquestionably NOT AT RISK & vaccinating them WILL ONLY RESULT IN PAIN, SUFFERING, LASTING INJURIES AND DEATH.

Children rarely even become symptomatic & are very poor transmitters of the virus. This isn’t theory. It’s been studied & it pretty much doesn’t happen that children bring the virus into the home. In a large study, on not one occasion was a child the ‘index case’ – the first infected person in a household.

So if you’re told “it’s to protect vulnerable family members”, THAT IS A LIE.

The information emerging over time from U.K. & Israel is now showing clearly that the vaccines DO NOT EVEN WORK WELL. If there’s any benefit, it wanes.

Finally, the vaccines ARE NOT EVEN NECESSARY. There are good, safe & effective treatments.

IF YOU PERMIT THIS TO GO AHEAD I GUARANTEE THIS: THERE WILL BE AVOIDABLE DEATHS OF PERFECTLY HEALTHY CHILDREN, and severe illnesses in ten times as many.

And for no possible benefit.

KNOWING WHAT I KNOW FROM 40 years TRAINING & PRACTISE IN TOXICOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY & PHARMACOLOGY, to participate in this extraordinary abuse of innocent children in our care can be classified in no other way than MURDER.

It’s up to you. If I had a secondary school age child in U.K., I would not be returning them to school next month, no matter what.

The state is going to vaccinate everyone. The gloves are off. This has never been about a virus or public health. It’s wholly about control, totalitarian & irreversible control at that, and they’re nearly there.

PLEASE SHARE THIS INFORMATION WIDELY.

With somber best wishes,
Mike

https://infiniteunknown.net/2021/08/26/red-alert-all-children-ages-12-to-15-to-be-injected-with-covid-19-shots-in-uk-schools-with-or-without-parental-consent-by-former-vice-president-chief-science-officer-of-pfizer-dr-mike-yeadon/

4 Likes
A Pharma executive opposes covid vaxx for 12 to 15 year olds without mention of alternatives such as ivermectin!
#2

Thanks @Rich for the post - MY’s red alert is confirmed by most of the MSM but they have gone on to the BBC presenter’s death and balanced it with added references to a BJM study ( conveniently financed by the Government and I think Wellcome was there as well ) which says deaths from COVID vascular injury far greater than those from the vaccine - well there’s a surprise :

There has to be some gaping holes in this analysis - it seemed to me it was just brought out to counter the narrative of the Coroner’s views on the death of the BBC presenter and the Government’s annoyance at the JVCI for not quickly authorising the jab for all 12 to 15 year olds.

cheers

PS I looked at the study but it was way beyond me - I didn’t see a comparison with COVID cases that had been treated early with HCQ, Ivermectin, HP, Vits C and D and zinc to see whether they had failed to go on to experiencing vascular/blood issues - maybe they should have checked out India.

#3

Rich this has got to be a line in the sand, for even the brain dead egits who believe all the covid nonsense.

#4

I agree with @RobG that this should be a line in the sand. For those with kids or grand kids, The Bernician has a post with sample notices to serve on schools.

#5

@RobG

Speaking as a brain dead eejit who believes much of the covid nonsense, I agree with you too. Happily I have no children to worry about… I wonder at the pressure on poor black or Asian families who can’t afford to have their kids out of school, or the fines and legal action that could follow if they do decide to keep the kids at home.

It’s infuriating…

2 Likes
#6

Hi @PontiusPrimate, you’re right of course about the poverty gap affecting these decisions. Wealthier parents merely opt for home-schooling or employ good lawyers who would I think be successfull in arguing many human rights as well as demanding schools obey their prime directive when acting in loco parentis - protect each child from harm. Schools cannot claim the wider social so-called excuse of protecting others by injection of all, their only prime job is to protect children and there is no evidence children are serious spreaders of covid or that injections do less damage to them than covid.

The poverty gap will ensure most parents don’t have the money to gain access to the “protection of the law” and will no doubt be unable to survive without both parents working making home schooling almost impossible.

When the UK authorities follow the FDA and fully authorise injections ( if that’s what the FDA has done, Malone seems to question that to some extent) then I think we’re facing a de facto mandatory policy countrywide, not just for kids. Insurance companies will be stepping in with eye-watering premiums for those companies not operating a “no jab, no job policy” or even “no passport no pass” for employees and customers alike! The nice legal arguments about our human rights versus health security will then just fall though the cracks as easily as a virus passes through masks! :wink:

cheers

1 Like
#7

Hi @CJ1

Yes, exactly. I also agree with your broader points about wealth and schools etc. Well said

Cheers

1 Like
#8

PP, consider the following (just a very short list):

The PCR test, on which this whole pandemic is based, is a complete scam.

Death rates in 2020, and indeed so far in 2021, are no different from previous years (these are government figures).

On the basis of this the psychos want to force everyone to have an experimental gene therapy injected into them, otherwise they won’t be able to live a normal life.

The conflict of interest between big pharma and the totally corrupt psychos who rule us is bigger than an elephant in the room.

Seriously, you have more chance of a grand piano falling on your head than being killed by this total nonsense they call covid 19.

Do you really believe all this total crap???!!!

1 Like
#9

Or more importantly, if you do believe this total crap, the obvious question is : Why?

#10

Hi Rob

I think that, used correctly, the PCR test is a very powerful tool in helping to manage covid. I wrote a long piece about this on the board a while ago. It can obviously be misused, but if used correctly it’s a very accurate test and could be a vital part of a sane public health response. Just for the record, I don’t think that the UK govt is using PCR correctly.

I am also pretty sure now, based on various reported figures - some government and some not - and also from direct frontline reports that millions of people died from Covid over the last 18 months. Again, I’ve written a fair bit about that on this board. Most of those who died were elderly or otherwise vulnerable, but there were a lot of deaths nonetheless.

I agree with you by and large about forcing people (especially young people) to take a vaccine that had as many problems and as little testing as this one. Especially as it looks like there are effective treatments that could be used instead. I also 100% agree with you about the corruption of big pharma.

One huge problem is the unbelievable level of censorship about any and all criticisms of the vaccine, in a blatant attempt to silence what seem to be very valid concerns. This censorship is obviously trying to manufacture consent across the entire covid discourse, and that worries and infuriates me in equal measure. It’s not just the vaccine - ivermectin and other treatments are treated in the same way, and as @Evvy_dense had shown, there is a lot of data fudging going on. The level of manipulation of the public discourse is off the charts. As you yourself have said, it’s on a par with public discourse after the Twin Tower episode.

Open dialogue and looking at data from all sides is the only way forward, in my opinion

Cheers

2 Likes
#11

This really is for @PontiusPrimate . In the heat of this plandemic, as RobG has said 2020 was no different to previous years. In fact 2020 was the 9th worst year for the last 20 years (population adjusted figures). which puts it almost smack bang in the middle. So much for this dangerous disease.

Perhaps. But 40 and 45 cycles as used all over Europe, with Kary Mullis himself saying after 25 cycles the results are meaningless, yes it is a very powerful tool. A tool to terrify, control, lockdown and otherwise abuse people.

Finally, I’m about to create a new topic of a Reiner Fuellmich interview. Some interesting new stuff about the isolation of this “novel corona virus”, but if you get to the end, you might hear that they have concluded that the “virus” is not the danger. Its the vaccine that’s the bioweapon and its only the immuno-compromised who sucumb to the virus on its own!

1 Like
#12

Amen to that, P. About open dialogue, I mean.

2 Likes
#13

Here in France, school begins on Thursday. Last I heard, children have until September 30 to get the vaccine. Also, apparently they will be setting up ‘vaccine centers’ inside the schools. I have two children, age 16 and 14 and I’m quite worried. My oldest can make the decision on his own volition. The younger must have the signature of one parent. I’m separated and my ex is pro vaxx and is a teacher.

I hope I can find a group with whom to demonstrate Thursday outside the schools, or the main admin building.

I’m quite pissed off about this as you can imagine. We had the biggest turnout yet at the Saturday demo, but the government is really unrelenting. As if the ‘orders are coming from somewhere above’.

Meanwhile Macron is in Iraq and scumbag establishment media pseudo intellectual bernard henry-levy is in Afghanistan with Massoud.

It’s a damn nightmare when your children are involved in this covid bullshit.

2 Likes
#14

Commiserations, E. A truly wretched situation. If your children get poisoned, use that calamity to harden your resolve to get the bastards behind this.

1 Like
#15

Hi Everyman. Yeadon’s article in the 1st post outlines the reasons why children shouldn’t be given the jab. If it’s a bit ranty it’s likely because he knows it’s not being done to protect the children.
If your communication channels with your ex are still open, Yeadon’s gripes could be the basis of a more rational-sounding case if toned down and backed up by evidence. It should jar with parents that the kids are being used to protect adults.
The ‘link’ in peoples’ minds between older vaccines and the current gene therapies could be challenged.
Moderna for example had never even got a previous vaccine on the market, and market it as gene therapy to their shareholders. If you’re pro-vaccine you should be pro- the normal testing period (10-15 years), and pro-vaccines that are necessary.
I’m sure you know all this but there’s quite a lot when put together. The blood clots are established in younger people (may be worse the younger you get?) as indeed is myocarditis, that’s two reasons to expect harm on one side of the balance sheet. Why does covid risk to children outweigh this? Every reference I’ve seen to ‘risk-benefit’ comparison is misleading spin, even for adults let alone for children.
Lots of strongly pro-vaccine people who are well placed to know like Robert Malone, a guy called Dingwall who was on the JVC1 in the UK and Peter Doshi say the balance falls on the wrong side for kids.

7/1/21 Scientists say younger people might be better off catching virus
Children may be better off catching Covid than having a vaccination
Professor Robert Dingwall said it may be safer due to small risk of side effects
Poll found three in four people support offering the vaccine to all children
Children may be better off catching Covid-19 naturally than having a vaccination, according to a key government expert Scientists say younger people might be better off catching virus - inbeautymoon.com

BMJ Associate Editor Peter Doshi (Much info in the links)
13/7/21 Covid-19 vaccines for children: hypothetical benefits to adults do not outweigh risks to children

Might it be a start if you could get agreement in advance to try decide on the basis of the evidence, and the interests of the kids!? (How much has outside pressure to do with it?)

Good luck

1 Like
#16

Second that.

These M-feckers have all got to be put on trial.

2 Likes
#17

Hi @Everyman really sorry to hear about your predicament my guess is that it won’t be long before we follow suit.
For children this is an absolute disgrace and fully support the views expressed by @Evvy_dense above.
The key questions for your ex partner is " what if you’re wrong? ", kids are not just suffering heart inflammation but actually dying all over the world with the jab at rates far in excess of covid risks particularly as treatment protocols are readily available without the jab “are you really prepared to sacrifice your own children on a coin toss?”

all the best

cheers

1 Like
#18

Thanks CJ. Any chance you could copy & paste the Telegraph articles? They’re behind a paywall and I can’t access them. Best, R.

#19

I hope you’re right Rob but I’m really not sure that this will be the case.

I had imagined that a large majority of people would give up the masks on 19th July - how wrong could I be! On a visit to my nearest large supermarket the same day only abt 5% of people were not wearing masks - I was expecting 70-80%. The staff fared better @ 50%. There were less people outside in the open air wearing them but I reckon only 20% less.

That’s what really got to me - even when Big Brother tells them there’s no need to wear them anymore they still go on wearing them!

1 Like
#20

Hi @Rich , I only saw them for a few seconds myself , I think there may be a free trial on at the moment , I didn’t go for it!

cheers