including some on ‘excess deaths’… And yes, it’s a nearly-an-hour video (chock full with slides and dense information). Deal with it. Or cut off your nose to spite your face: 
2 Likes
Thanks @RhisiartGwilym for this loads of interesting stuff
- the virologists will hate the analysis on lack of isolation of sars cov 2 virus!
- satanists masked and standing 6 ft from each other says a lot for the derivation of these rules
- kids more likely to be struck by lightning than catch covid, she showed the Express also in mirror:
Kids more likely to be struck by lightning than die of coronavirus, figures suggest - Mirror Online - use of gmo food to transmit vaccines is this the rationale for Gates’ massive acquisition of agricultural land in US?
Cheers
Incredable video. Thanks @RhisiartGwilym . I especially like the fatality rate of Coroni in Uganda, that bastion of excelent medical services, free to all and with the worlds best doctor to population ratio!!
Especially for @PontiusPrimate . If you can disprove any of the key points in this video, I’ll agree to stop using “Coroni”, “Scamdemic”, “Plandemic”, “Casedemic”, AND, I’ll even stopping asking “What Pandemic”!!
2 Likes
Lol, such a challenge! I’ll have a look, but I’ll say now that my chance of convincing you of anything at all hovers around zero percent, regardless of the analysis I use.
Happily it’s not my goal to convince you of anything. It’s my goal to try and understand what’s going on to the best of my ability.
Have a great day
PP
4 Likes
1 Like
We love ya, P! Four likes already! Stay well, ya bastard! 
1 Like
I’m ready to accept almost anything now, that I would have regarded as far fetched a year ago, except for point one! Yesterday I sent the full genetic code of the virus, as analysed by Chinese scientists in mid-January from virus samples taken from a patient a couple of weeks earlier, who reportedly picked it up from the Wuhan wet market where those dastardly Yanks spread it around… There are two reports, the first a paper describing the analysis:
While this includes details of the base sequence, all 29,900 bits of it:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947
If we say this is fabricated, then what is the point in discussing the effects of HCQ or Ivermectin, or the way the spike protein antibodies circulate and create problems as described by Robert Malone? I can’t reconcile these two fundamental differences, despite respect for Dr Lee Merritt.
Now I’ve got that off my chest I’ll have a look!
2 Likes
I think that’s the problem with being in constant ‘bashing’ mode, you can be endorsiing contradictory criticisms.
It’s not implausible that if the parts of the code that are key to present purposes were unlocked, large parts of the code were just filled in with random items. Like hacking parts of a computer program that you find you can. The missing parts are a hostage to fortune but the hack might still do a job. Evidently, it did! 
The lack of certainty is a hazard for the whiz hacker but doesn’t stop the ‘main’ function from working.
The leap to claiming the virus itself is a hoax is a short term push for supporters, but in my view isn’t worth the perceived reduction in credibility that will likely result.
Cheers
Hi PP
I’ve been thinking about this, it caused me to Um and Aw to myself 
What is the objective meaning? That PatB is the kind of person who will automatically reject an analysis, even a sound one, because it doesn’t fit with his beliefs?
Or, alternatively, could it be that you have not produced an analysis that was sufficiently sound?
How do you verify your proposition? Only by producing sound analyses that PatB is seen to reject.
How does PatB refute your position? By pointing to the absence of a sound analysis that he allegedly rejects.
I can see how, with widely differing views on this issue, either of you might think that way but is the problem with your formulation that even attempting to resolve it would ‘up’ the adhom!?
Cheers
I made that point slightly tongue in cheek. Partly because of comments like this one from Pat
and this one
I think you’ll agree that my chances of convincing someone who completely discounts what I consider to be evidence, is pretty hard!
PP
1 Like
Ha ha yes I see there was a context, as there was to that thread too. Though clearly Pat doesn’t like your sources! Some people are just, you know, suspicious! 
1 Like
Hi @Dimac , I agree on the question of the existence of the virus - I was careful in saying who might have problems with this ( I recall a zoom video with Merritt and Malone and a virologist who was clearly annoyed at Merritt’s question and who basically said Koch’s postulate is old hat and a waste of time). I think the virus exists but is man-ipulated to harm us and in fact harms us more radically than the creators thought where our immune system is depleted and where it combines with our polluted environments water and food ( see Zach Bush’s analysis ).
What is worth looking at is why ivermectin and HCQ are so effective in the prophylactic and early stages of the illness. The Indian real life events over the last 6 months clearly show ivermectin works like a charm , ( hat tip stevelancs from the TLN:
) this was interesting:
“Dr. John Campbell broke India’s Ivermectin Blackout wide open on YouTube by revealing the formula of the secret sauce, much to the dismay of Big Pharma, the WHO, and the CDC. Readers will want to watch this before it is taken down. See mark 2:22.”
also watch his take down of BBC debunk of ivermectin :
But what does it do to help the body achieve these dramatic benefits? Surely this would tell us something fundamental about the virus?
cheers
1 Like
Hi @PontiusPrimate . OK. I understand, so I’ll try to explain.
First, figures! Well, Matt Hancock himself admitted there had been a cock up (my words) by overcounting Coroni deaths by 5,000. The Italians have now admitted to the same. Ilnesses are always (historically) diagnosed by clinical assesment and perhaps then followed by tests. Deaths are then followed by pathologists assesments. None of which was done for Coroni deaths. And as for tests, the PCR seems to me to become more discredited every day, if even more discredited is possible. And as has been shown by a number of resputable scientists, the “virus” has never, ever, been isolated, so even if we had a reliable test, what would we be testing for. I’ll just say one more thing on the figures front. Death from Coroni and death with Coroni (if we actually knew what it was) are not the same and we know that there has been massive pressure on all sectors of the health service to call them death due to Coroni.
So on to evidence. Many of us know of someone who has “had” Coroni, and you know several who have died “of” Coroni. For everyone I come across who knows someone who has “had” it or died “of it”, there are so many questions. Perhaps, what was the clinical diagnosis? Or what were the symptons? Oh. You mean an “influeza like illness” (which I believe flu is called these days). If they died, do we know what the treatment protocol was, did they delay going to the hospital because the government told them not to go, and finally had they had a PCR “test”?
Keep the faith brother. We’ll get there.
1 Like
Oh and for the record: I do accept that there is a real Corona virus floating about which has been bio-engineered for gain of function!