Yes, arenât these studies supposed to be done before you advocate their use en masse? And on top of that, they should be done by the companies. Whoâs paying for this now?
Again, that word ârareâ. RT is very keen to stress this.
âRareâ is MSM radical.
I heard âextremely rareâ by a talking head on the radio earlier.
I went looking for more - two minutes well spent:
Scientists may have found the âtriggerâ behind the incredibly rare blood clot complications stemming from the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine.
(The Scotsman/EdinburghNews)
And that was from today!
Donât forget ultrarare as per the second of the links
The researchers underline that cases of blood clots are âultrarareâ because many complicated factors must coincide for them to occur.
Sarcasm mode engagedâŚ
Factors include:
- being human
- being jabbed
- short illness
etc
I see, so RT is being subversive. Just spotted a âvanishingly rareâ.
Perhaps it will be a myth next.
Isnât âvanishingly rareâ incorrect - I thought that was borrowed from maths where something is called vanishingly small if it approaches zero as a limit. Like the probability of winning N coin tosses, when there is no limit to N.
Now itâs hijacked to give the false impression that a risk has âvanishedâ.
Thatâs right; in maths it often refers to some event having zero probability of occurring. Eg choosing the number 1 `at randomâ from all the integers â it can occur but the chances are, well, vanishingly rare. Unlike choosing 1 from a finite set
Indeed!
But the conversation isnât finished yet. They can still use âanecdotallyâ reported clots, or âmisdiagnosedâ
Ah. As in â15000 fans reportedly saw Diep van Trombose, 25, collapse at yesterdayâs big match, according to controversial commentator Trevor Sinclairâ?