Comment left btl on Jim Kunstler's 'Clusterfuck Nation' blog for today

[RhisiartGwilym]

Jim and his readers are well forward on understanding that the scamdemic is a sinister fake. Lots of interesting input from the btls. This was mine:

SELFQUOTE:

I like the idea of anyone at all - anywhere in the world - being actually able to supply a fully-purified, electron-microscope-visible, real physical sample of this ‘virus’, rather than just some GIGO in-silico guess of what it should be, according to current in-group ‘virus’ theory.

No one, anywhere, seems able to do this, when FOIAed. None of the many claims to have ‘isolated’ the ‘virus’ stand up to detailed examination. And the word ‘isolated’ seems to be one of that sheaf of words that have been unilaterally re-defined since the start of the pseudopandemic.

Meanwhile, the seemingly long-dormant controversy about whether ‘viruses’ exist at all has resurrected suddenly: an unforeseen consequence of the pseudopandemic conspiracy.

Bet the conspirators didn’t table-top game plan that… LOLOLOL!

And yes, I know: Even before the poison-stabs started killing and maiming people en masse, a lot of people seem to have died unnecessarily from - what? Some sort of flu-like illness; which could have been cured easily with EARLY treatments based around hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin or - above all - mega-dose intra-venous vitamin C.

All of these approaches are well known and well proven, despite the determined criminal efforts by the conspirators to censor and suppress them. C-treatment has been well-proven in China. Early treatment based around hydrogen-peroxide also seems to work pretty well too - for those doctors who’ve actually prescribed it.

But this excess death-toll - as announced in commercial horror by the life-insurance providers - doesn’t prove the existence of the pseudopandemic. It’s better seen as proof of the conspiracy, proof of the lethality of the poison-stabs - and maybe proof of the existence of some sort of tampered flu-pathogen, whatever it really is.

Whatever it is, so long as it’s treated early it seems to be not much more lethal than an average flu - and just as treatable. I caught the bug in Spring, 2020, aged 79, and self-treated with thirty grams (sic! grams, not milligrams!) per day of vitamin C powder in water, taken by mouth, a mouthful every half hour - aka divided doses. As with all attempts by cold/flu pathogens to make me ill over the past 25-plus years, this one was unable to produce anything worse than something less than a mild cold; and it was gone completely by the fourth day. No doctor, no hospital, no sweat - literally!

Going on 82 now, and still scoffing contemptuously at the whole ‘pandemic’ scam, omni-con and all! As long as you’re reasonably fit, and have plenty of C on hand, the whole con is nothing to worry about.

Btw, visit Andrew Saul’s ‘Doctoryourself.com’ website for the lowdown on C. Comprehensive!

UNQUOTE

[PatB]

Hi Rhis. Tom Cowan has just done a podcast on “Do the pictures on the electron microscope prove the virus exists”. I haven’t watched it yet but probably worth a watch if there is still real doubt about virus isolation.

Do the Pictures on the Electron Microscope Prove That SARS-COV-2 Exists? -...

[AlanG]

Hi Rhis. Miriam recently started going down with a cold and decided to dose herself according to the Gwilym protocol. She woke the following morning and said “I can’t go tonight” (We were due at a resistance gathering in Manchester that evening) and was obviously not right. She went on dosing anyway and a couple of hours later found herself pretty much symptom-free. We had a bloody good night out after all and OK since. (Thinks - thanks to Dr. Rhisiart’s elixir!)

[RhisiartGwilym]

My experience, Alan, has been that it’s something close to a panacea. But I hasten to add that I suspect there’s a mental aspect to the situation, which makes it into a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy: you get well because you’re confident that you’re going to get well. And that confidence comes from your own past experience of it working regularly. Which of course is partly because there is some real biochemical healing effect in the molecule as well, to start with; but the accumulated confidence definitely helps.

We had clear demonstration of this basic truth of the reality that we inhabit - that mind-state affects physical outcomes in any situation, directly, by PK if you will - in Ken Batcheldor’s last sitter group, of which I was a visiting member in the late '80s. Ken always took care to do subtle encouragement of the ‘right’ mind-state in every meeting - a skill that he’d been honing over 25 years of running the sitter-group technique. And sure enough: when the atmosphere of the meeting was ‘hot’, the paranormal events which we conjured up - reliably!! - were equally spectacular: teleports, levitations, lights in the air, materialisations, disembodied voices, and so on - you name it: the whole gamut of paranormalities reported from the Victorian heyday of seances-for-fun!

Beginners start off with a bit of a bootstrapping job, of course: you study the ideas, listen to people’s stories of their own successes, then enter a trial with the right pre-primed mind-state; and lo and behold, in the case of C, biochemistry and psi, acting in tandem, give you a result!

That’s how acclimatisation-and-track-record - AATREC - works. It was one of Ken’s two most vital insights about psi. And it’s very reliable, if you commit to the early work which creates your steadily lengthening and strengthening AATREC. I’d say that both you and Mrs. A are well started with your joint AATREC now. Keep at it! You should be pleased with results. My main approach to all the ills that life can offer, these days, is C and cannabis, taken by mouth twice daily, two well-proven, wide-acting helpers; plus the all-important right mind-state, natch!

PS: NEVER be afraid to take BIG blasts of C, when under pressure from some incipient illness. It seems that - apart from the very rare people who are susceptible to genetic haemochromatosis - there’s no known OD. See Andrew Saul’s ‘Doctoryourself.com’ website for all the detailed lowdown…

PPS: Being an unfanatical eclectic in these things, I’m also giving a certain pick’n’mix tryout to allopathic stuff urged on me by the heart clinic that I attend. No sense in throwing out the useful baby with the bad-Pharma iffy bathwater stuff, of course. You just have to study up on what they’re offering, then watch results carefully - pro and contra - whilst you’re trying it. My assigned nurse tells me that if I’ll just try this stuff, we might be able to keep me going for another ten years! To which my answer is: “Only if I can feel a bit less buggered than I do at the moment. Otherwise death and re-birth as a fresh young infant seems a better bet.” But she seems to think it’s worth a try.

[Everyman]

[Everyman]

[RhisiartGwilym]

You’ll note, I daresay, E, that key word ‘template’ in your first exhibit: the idea that, to use Kary Mullis’s exquisitely sensitive technique according to it’s original conception, you need a sample - a ‘primer’ as they call it - to search for and amplify examples amongst the biological debris under test: for other iterations of the same molecular form, which are then photocopied by the process, so to speak, until you have a large pure physical sample; but created by the PCR process; not actually found en masse in the original debris sample, where in fact it may be so sparsely present as to be for all practical purposes absent. As Kary said: “Use PCR right, and you can find anything in anything.”

The point about faking the RT-PCR process to ‘diagnose’ covid, or any other supposed ‘viral infection’, is that you first need physical, proven samples of the ‘virus’, to be the template of what your seek. And the mounting evidence seems to be bringing clear the uncomfortable reality that no-one, anywhere, can produce such a satisfactorily-proven, physical sample; lots of GIGO games on computers, all the end results of long chains of iffy theoretical assumptions, but no actual, unmistakable, uncontroversial physical samples, clearly visible as such under magnification.

The deeper you go digging, the more the suspicion grows that the whole kaboodle is founded on enthusiastic, wilful group delusion: Virology as a faith-based religion.

This is the conclusion that sceptics such as Cowan, Lanka, Kaufman, Bailey, et al. are proposing as a genuine assessment of the discipline. A bit like the Ptolemaic Geo-centric solar system, so widely taken as unquestionable doctrine amongst the technocrats of the time, until Galileo’s generation of sceptics overturned it, into the discard bin of the history of science.

I think - tentatively, always tentatively! - that I begin to smell that same odour of moribundity coming from the current ‘established, unquestionable truth’ of virus theory…

[Everyman]

With all his expertise in magnification of genetic material, and his willingness to question dogma, I find it odd that Mullis never questioned viral theory, as shown above. He obviously believed viruses existed. I would think it would be easy and cheap to set up experiments to definitively proof the non existence of viruses, because, according to virology, they attack bacteria and bacteria is also quite plentiful and cheap. Currently scientists are able to manipulate successfully smaller entities than viruses, genes for example via CRISPR technology.

[PatB]

It seems to me that guys like Malone are so steeped into the mainstream thinking for their whole llivelyhood, that they convince themselves to accept what their critical thinking should say is wrong.

I remember Peter McCullogh, before he became one of the go to critics of the current policies. He was asked has the virus been sequenced. He was quite dismissive in his answer which went along the lines of, “Of course it has. Its been sequenced hundreds of times”. As Rhis often says, everyone has their blind spots, even if they are the size of an elephant!