5 Filters

Chomsky on covid

Finally found something from Chomsky regarding covid.

He doesn’t say a great deal but, from what he does say, he sounds remarkably ignorant and stupid; and he says nothing about the chilling consequences, now and to come, on civil rights:

NC: In the United States a substantial number of people are refusing to get vaccinated. They’re overwhelmingly Republicans, and they give many reasons: distrust of government, distrust of science. But it’s not restricted to the United States. In France, for example, only about 40 percent of people intend to get it. There’s overwhelming evidence of the importance of taking the vaccine if we want to get this plague under control, but fear and dislike of government, science, and authority have reached such points that people are taking very dangerous actions to avoid what has to be done.

Compare this with other countries. Australia got the disease very quickly under control. One main reason is they have a highly effective health system, which people trust. They are willing to take collective responsibility for one another. They accepted harsh lockdowns, which were very successful, and the disease was essentially controlled. The same has happened in New Zealand, Taiwan, South Korea, and other countries. But there are places where the discontent and distrust is so high that a great many people are simply unwilling to join in the collective effort to control and put down the disease.

File under: ‘Past it!’, I’m sad to have to say. Noam seems not to have twigged the simply extraordinary level of deceit and censorship on blatant display around the ‘pandemic’ thing. He’s still taking the official picture seriously. And he’s bought the ‘vaccine’ scam too, apparently. Sad.

1 Like

His strength was always based on the information from his own digging. Latterdays, his quality drops alarmingly when he tries to take information off the shelf and pronounce on it. Even after 2001 he was winging it against the evidence.
Maybe it’s because on 9/11 and Covid, he couldn’t glean what was really happening from the business pages and official documents and reports. For him that’s the most solid basis from which to challenge his government. On these matters though, he needed to muck in and get his hands a bit ‘dirtier’.

1 Like

Is this even a coherent argument, whatever the assumptions are? An omission (to be jabbed) is not an action, let alone a dangerous one. But hey: seatbelts.

It’s sad we no longer have the wisdom of Ed Herman who could have perhaps brought out a book revision : “ the manufacturing of INFORMED consent” .

cheers

2 Likes