It’s one of the many iffy-sounding things in cyberspace about which I think: ‘Too crappy-seeming to spend my limited attention-capability on.’ So I haven’t looked into it. I imagine fifty well-chosen words would do as a sum up. Is there anything to it worth attention, even as a specimen-dissection in a ‘Human idiocy’ seminar…? Is it in the flat-earth category?
Almost as though it was planned all along… a possible source of answers appears:
Somewhat more than 50 words though.
QAnon adherents, and a variety of other seemingly sentient beings, are always pointing out that every instance of the number 33, including numbers that aren’t 33 at all, has some occult meaning and has been planted in a narrative to tell us that “they” are toying with us. Once you start to look for 33, or 23, 42, or ‘fnord’ they seem to be everywhere
See also Principia Discordia, the Church of the SubGenius, the Illuminatus Trilogy and even Foucault’s Pendulum. And flat earthers I reckon too.
As a P.S. to this, although the OffG ‘reprint’ is dated 24/03/21 there is an identical (seeming) article dating back to Nov 2020 here. If nothing else it puts into context the use of phrases like ‘a few months ago…’ etc.
Q-Anon is/was (in my humble opinion), a psy op. The Q-Anon’ers believed that one of the dead Kennedy’s (I forget which one) faked his own death and would be coming back to save America. The death was faked to keep him safe while preparing his comeback. Every time Trump failed to “drain the swamp” or do one of the other things he promised, the Q-Anon’ers would say “trust the plan”. I.e. It’s all part of the plan. There was a very professional 1 hour video floating around a while back, showing lots of stuff done by the deep state and it sucked in anyone without a real critical brain. For the first 45 minutes, I too almost believed.
The Kennedy was supposed to reappear for the presedential election but guess what? Maybe we should just trust the plan.
The Q-Anon’ers believed that one of the dead Kennedy’s (I forget which one) faked his own death and would be coming back to save America.
Jello Biafra maybe?
Neatly on cue comes this article at Off-G. Written by a SAfrican, but one who seems to have fallen victim to the USAmerican ignorance about phenomena/phenomenon. But at least he never writes ‘one of the only’.
Apart from that ignorance-of-Greek glitch, a useful summary from one who’s taken the trouble to study Q, so I don’t have to:
ZA is a template of the AngloZionosphere fitted on top of a still not quite entirely ruined African idyll. The constant stress of gilded prisons for the relatively privileged, terrified that they’ll lose what they have at any moment, is not as unpleasant as life in slums mere kilometres away, but neither is really tolerable. Gauteng, at any rate, is essentially Detroit.