Has made headlines…er, nowhere!
2 Likes
Thanks @Sanjeev. this reminded me that Neil Clark disappeared from my Twitter feed and I only just noticed. There are several other suspicious-looking “died after a short illness” stories on the feed, including another BBC employee.
No indication this was related to medicinal compound, but no claims of covid either, which by Baa Baa C standards probably meets the definition of “balanced”.
1 Like
Neil’s being very mild about it. He should look at the EudraVigilance figures too, and the universally-admitted fact that the data-collecting agencies’ numbers are known to be at best a smallish fraction of the true extent, to get a more investigative-journalistic notion of the true scale of the poison-stab disaster. An awkward, truth-digging i-j is what he presents as being after all; so - do it, Neil!
Still, at least he’s writing about it somewhat. More than the dead-silent lamestream mediawhores are doing. This is an unprecedented self-inflicted catastrophe, after all.
1 Like
? [555]
Thanks for this Sanjeev. Yes after the Heil reported it - on 26 August at 11 am, it crept out in the mainstream in ‘surprisingly’ sluggish fashion a full day later, including the so-concerned BBC. Wouldn’t have been headlines.
Neil Clark’s article is factually accurate. It certainly isn’t from an anti-vaccine viewpoint, he says he’s a regular flu jabber.
" Yet take the Covid vaccine she did on April 29, despite being in a very low risk category – and complications from it killed her. That’s not a ‘conspiracy theory’ – or the view of an ‘anti-vaxxer’ – it’s the official coroner’s report. All our thoughts go out to Lisa’s devastated family and friends.
Vaccines generally have been a great boon for humanity, but no vaccines are totally safe. Some, though, are safer than others for different age groups. It is worth noting that at the time poor Lisa had her first AstraZeneca dose in late April, the vaccine had already been suspended or temporarily banned in a number of Western countries over concerns it could cause dangerous blood clots in some recipients.
But not Britain.
I remember at the time, the various European suspensions were presented as ‘Johnny Foreigner’ wanting to get their own back on the Brits over Brexit. Britain’s rapid vaccine roll-out was the envy of the world, we were told, and the Europeans were just jealous."
I wonder if any media analysis sites will pick up the balance in Clark’s reporting.
1 Like
hi @Evvy_dense , NC is certainly more balanced but he failed to emphasise the different covid risks in different cohorts and made no reference to the non injection treatment protocols seen in India and parts of Mexico and maybe just through malaria prophilactic treatments in Africa and Asia.
Still at least he didn’t follow the MSM which dismissed injection damage using a government funded report led by Professor Julia Hippisley-cox from Oxford University. See my recent comments on the red alert post from Rich about mandating child jabs.
The study by H-C was too complex for me but it seemed to suggest that the same blood clotting cause of death occurred in jabbed as in unjabbed but with covid. Which brought me back to the point you made some days ago when you rightly reminded me the numbers being analysed related to deaths from covid and not from injuries from the jab alone - if there are symptoms which are due to covid and also due to just being jabbed how do we tell the difference whether the death is due to one or the other when it comes to statistical analysis?
cheers
1 Like