5 Filters

Baa Baa C shuts down uncomfortable discussion of Pakistan-Taliban links

The twitter thread linked near the top of this article is interesting, and has video content.

tl;dr: “Our bad guys are not as bad as those other bad guys” claims State Broadcaster

1 Like

Thanks @KarenEliot for such a beautiful example of our State Propagandist in action! The training the presenters and their headphone derived teams of analysts must have received to deal with live interviews is just staggering. All done without the usual sudden loss of sound and/or picture of the “difficultee” or the need to urgently go to a break or go onto the next item, like the weather, or the cuty kitten stories!
Strange that the presenter suddenly notices she hasn’t got a view from the other side - maybe she’s so used to running a covid piece, where of course there is no other side, she failed to notice. The presenter made up for the lack of “balance” (which they of course set up in the first place to facilitate this “shut down procedure”) by leaping into the gap with the official BBC troof - but notice the straw all over the studio floor as “support for the Taliban in the 1990’s” evolves into “creator of the Taliban and prime mover behind the Taliban” to fit the troof the holy troof and nuffing butt the troof which is only available from the BBC! The “sintoview” ends with the Professor subconsciously seeking confirmation of her own existence with “To be fair, to be fair…

But wonderful responses from the Professor - I will be looking for her book.

cheers

Blockquote

2 Likes

Indeed, also a must for any course on “How to ensure you never get invited back to the Baa Baa C”.

Lately the Baa-Baa-C has taken to calling the Taliban a “group”. I suppose that means Bozo Johnson and his associates are a “group” too, dunnit? And the Biden puppeteers? Right now on the 8 AM ‘news’ we’re informed that the Tali are also being told by the UN - as the Baa-Baa puts it - what they “must” do about Afghans in dire straits and needing immediate aid. Did you know that the UN can order national governments about like this?

The flatulent ridiculousness of these bulletins is gob-smacking. Sheep-farts on steroids! The English-raj class, clearly, just can’t swallow the spectacular way the Taliban have handed all of them there own arses, can they? Positively gobbling with indignation like the turkeys they are.

I surmise that this latest piece of impudent bollocks from the Baa Baa sheep-herders indicates that the ukstate compradors have decided not to recognise the Taliban as the de-facto government of Afghanistan just yet, because ‘our leaders’ owners in the Washington Swamp are still trying to lessen the debacle of their ignominious defeat and ejection by the guerrillas, and to see what ways they might still cause trouble in Afghanistan. The ‘Panjshir-valley resistance’ ploy seems to have collapsed already… :grinning:

As numerous people have observed just lately, US international-policy strategists seem to be spectacularly bone-headed these days. Not that that would discourage the arse-kissers in Downing Street and amongst the Baa’s mandarinate, of course. Must follow the overlord’s cues at all costs! Tongues still superglued to fundaments, even as it becomes ever clearer that the Anglozionist empire is collapsing.

1 Like

I think it might’ve been Bill Hicks who did a great skit on the use of terms like “clubs” or “guilds” for the good guys, but “gangs” or “rings” for the black hats. As he pointed out, a drugs club sounds pretty cozy and harmless compared to a drugs gang or a smuggling ring.

The State Broadcaster will frame the good guys as an Administration and this week’s baddies as a regime. It really is playground stuff.