5 Filters

Apparently the clots are contagious

Great…

1 Like

Here are Major Tom’s basic (unsupported) assertions:

Haviland says research shows these white fibrous clots can make other people sick.
The tests that discovered these fibrous clots can be infectious were run by Dr. Kevin McCarin [sic] in Japan. Here’s the scary part. . . .

Scary’ is the actual message. Run screaming to the hills everybody.

What McCairn actually asserts in ‘Final Thoughts’ in conclusion to his research (which was, presumably, done mostly on a computer) is this:

embalmer white clots are not merely anomalous thrombi but rather:

Highly resistant, prion-capable amyloid structures with the potential to cause multi-organ dysfunction, neurodegeneration and public health challenges not yet fully appreciated.

In other words the clots themselves have ‘the potential to cause’ the exact same medical problems already shown to be directly caused by the vaccines. Again, in other words, if you get poison directly into your bloodstream, say, from a vaccine, you may well get ill.

How many times must we be told to be bloody scared? What’s his game? Judging from the assumptions he makes in unsupported assertions of his own on the Health Alliance Australia website, we find Dr McCairn wants us to believe in ‘viruses’ (SARS-COV-2, HIV & Zika), diseases called Covid19 & long covid, spike proteins, the synthetic, bio-warfare origins of ‘SARS-COV-2’, the ‘targeting of fibrin’ to produce specific symptoms:

Dr Kevin McCairn concluded that that the pathophysiology of long covid is based on the insertion of spike protein motifs with Zika nomology that mimics HIV GP120 spike protein properties and these features were designed features in the synthetic assembly of SARS-COV-2, a deliberate insert into the biowarfare agent to initiate a specific effect, the targeting of fibrin such that a person develops the sequelae of long COVID, which is characterized by extreme fatigue and neuropathy.

Well, I can make assertions with the best of them but mine are supported by fact and logic:-

  1. HIV, the Zika virus & SARS-COV-2 (and -1 come to that!) have yet to be isolated from a sick person, characterised and shown to make anyone ill. They ‘exist’, literally virtually, as computer-generated speculations.
  2. Hence the existence of Covid19 & long covid have yet to be established.
  3. Hence the existence of spike proteins (tiny protuberances on particles yet to be proved to exist!) ditto.
  4. Hence the entirely speculative and fantastical allusions to bio-warfare are bullshit designed to keep us all in the box.
  5. There is an awful lot of propaganda about.
  6. We are better off living without fear - rational and irrational.

Enough already.

1 Like

It’s not well explained Alan but the contagiousness comes from the fact that prions have actually been confirmed in the experiments - not “may be” as this article suggests.

This further link

“Then, in March 2025, Dr. McCairn performed a Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion Test (i.e., “RT-QuIC Test”) on 3 different white fibrous clot samples to determine the presence of prion-like seeding activity. All 3 sample clots tested “positive” for prion-like seeding activity!”

The language is ‘scary’ and a bit tabloidesque, but I think that’s due to having raised the alarm to the medical world - and the media and the public - about these clots for years now without anything changing, and having now found an escalated danger via contagion, there is reason to try to shout even louder, to try to reach more people.

Or maybe it’s to try to talk over those who treat every important news item as a soap-box for their own unsubstantiated theory of (no)viruses! :wink: (Covid vaccine spike proteins definitely exist btw).

One might equally say, “Unsubstantiated theory of germs and viruses causing illness”?

Yes, one - or two or three - might (quite a big number for this forum :slightly_smiling_face :slight_smile:
I just threw that word in in frustration, as the real substance of the article was being denied.

My point is that the article is about the “vaccines”, which definitely exist, and are still being pushed on to people while the grave problems unfold quietly.
There is no mention of any virus in the article, other than to specify that the covid jabs are what are causing this NEW harm.

We’re already discussing the ‘novirus’ issue on another thread. Yet here we are watching cold water being poured over a serious new warning, one with global scope, because of an essentially separate issue.

Cheers

1 Like

Hi folks, could someone point to a peer reviewed paper showing that the white fibrous contorted clots ( as distinct to the smooth natural clots found in the blood) are contagious or infectious to other people - McCairn papers do not mention the word contagious ? Given the billions who have taken the jab - mere numbers of clot caused deaths could all be jab related damage without involving contagion afaics. Blood transfusions from the jabbed are of course another source.

cheers

Hi @CJ1. As far as I can tell prions are contagious by definition. I meant to say that but forgot! So it’s the clots containing prions that is the news.
Not sure about peer reviewed - on a topic such as this, it’s harder to get inconvenient truths past peer review than it is lying BS.
Cheers

From Kimi AI; " Prion diseases can be transmitted through:

** Ingestion: Consuming contaminated meat products.*

** Infection: Direct exposure to infected brain tissue or bodily fluids.*

** Genetic Mutation: Some prion diseases can be inherited due to mutations in the prion protein gene."*

As we know all western medicine is either BS or very sus at best. However, assuming that is correct, then the issue of ‘shedding’ seems to me to be pretty unlikely unless one is an undertaker, or an infected person walking down the street is spraying urine into the air or leaking brain fluid.

My purely lay view is that shedding is just another part of the psy op to keep us all afraid and away from each other.

1 Like

Hi @PatB

Hm…what about blood donors?
Might not be a big proportion of people who could be affected, but absolute numbers could still be high, like the Hep C thing.

Would a psy op like clot/shedding result in scaring people away from the vaccines

Haven’t delved into this myself, but reliable people (in my own reliable opinion :grinning:) in a good position to know say shedding is definitely a thing.

\ 40x40
](Pierre Kory, MD, MPA | Substack) Pierre Kory, MD, MPAFeb 6 · Pierre Kory’s Medical Musings

This weekend, I presented what we now know about shedding injuries to a packed audience at the annual FLCCC conference in Phoenix. Much of this has been made possible by the remarkable work of my colleague AMD and over 1,000 people sharing their shedding experiences with us. Please read the below article from AMD and consider sharing your shedding experiences as well. We need to amass the evidence to prove this is a critical issue that must be taken seriously.

What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports

Actually Pfizer acknowledge shedding too, one of the conditions of accepting people into their ‘trials’ was about avoiding various kinds of contact with others (within, from memory, something like 48 hours) that could shed the vaccine components. Might have a link somewhere for that.

Cheers

You’re right. Hadn’t thought of that one.

No, but it might put the heebeejeebees into those nasty unvaxed people.

That said, if Pierre Kory says shedding is a thing, I have to retract what I said. Oh well, a broken clock is right twice a day :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

1 Like

Would you play hide the sausage with a vaxxed person?

Sorry to be thick, but I don’t get what you are asking?

Think it needs a photo…

PMSL! Not a chance.

@PatB Would you have sex with a vaccinated person?

Ahhhh. I think I may have got it. Married to an anti-vaxer so think what @LocalYokel is suggesting is out of the question. The answer to his question (us naive guys don’t understand subtle) is, well I’ll need to see who I’m playing with before claiming the 5th!!

As for picture @Evvy_dense , I don’t think you’ll get those past the mods :joy::joy::joy:

2 Likes

Hypothetically?

If you can separate the wife risk from the life risk?

1 Like

From Telegram;

Attorney Todd Callender: "According to our mass spectrometry analysis, it seems the shots didn’t directly contain graphene oxide.

Instead, they included the precursor compounds that enable the body to produce graphene oxide on its own. Essentially, once these chemicals are in the body and exposed to specific levels of magnetic radiation, such as certain frequencies from phone signals, the body may begin to generate graphene hydroxide."