I’m thinking of joining his AMA today and asking a couple things. No guarantee that he’ll answer, of course.
Let me know!
Cheers
PP
I have only one question for him, but it would not be published and if you asked it, the polizi would be at your door to take you to the gulag.
Bon chance!
2 Likes
Hehehe. I might be able to guess the general thrust of that question 
1 Like
Well after you’ve asked Pat’s question…mine would be
What advice or restrictions were given to the media regarding coverage and reporting of the pandemic and the vaccines in particular?
A possible follow up, if he bites…
What consideration was given to the output from the World Economic Forum pandemic planning meeting of 2019.
Cheers
2 Likes
asked! Let’s see if he bites!
EDIT - also asked whether he has any info about the lab-leak hypothesis…
1 Like
Wow! 5f joins the political set.
hmm… no answers to me so far…
Some replies:
on the lab leak theory:
“I can’t comment on classified stuff. N Wade in BAS recently summarised the case well… In any event there ought to be serious discussion now of ‘gain of fucntion’ research. And the way much of the media called anybody who suggested this racist must be remembered in future – the mainstream media is MUCH more destructive than social media!”
and
"There are powerful arguments in favour of lab leak but not decisive… "
on ED’s question above
“No restrictions, Can’t remember that mtng being mentioned but maybe forgotten”
on why they didn’t implement a proper track trace and supported isolation as recommended by Indy SAGE
"You overestimate the extent to which there was coherent thinking re strategy. That ain’t how BJ works. The trolley just smashed around day after day - after wave 1 he wished he’d not locked down and he was worred re economy, not wave 2 "
That’s all folks. Make of that what you will!
Cheers
PP
1 Like
Wow - thanks for that PP. If he’s telling the truth that means the BBC and Guardian acted to suppress sensible hesitant voices on their own bat.
An old man in a chair spilled the beans but it was obvious anyway.
We Don’t Debate with Anti-Vaxxers – Whether They’re Right or Wrong’ – Says BBC Speaking last autumn a BBC presenter called, Emma Barnett, said we actually don’t, as a matter of editorial policy, we don’t debate with anti-vaxxers, whether they’re right or wrong. We actually don’t do that.’
Link: `We Don’t Debate with Anti-Vaxxers – Whether They’re Right or Wrong’ – Says BBC - Truth Comes to Light
Would like to see the story behind this coming out. The most likely explanation is Gates’ money.
And the Guardian? Ditto
REVEALED: A Guardian website receives MILLIONS in funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation!
Link: REVEALED: A Guardian website receives MILLIONS in funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation! – Unity News Network