"But in the same way as terror networks have been born, a movement is growing that greets every good new thing as an evil that must be shunned. A vaccine, a vitamin, or your right to vote for who’s in the town hall, is all at risk if the whackos find a way to break into the mainstream.
When they find a calm, reasonable-sounding, public relations dream to provide the relatable face for their lunacy - and they will, if not stopped - vaccines become less effective, vitamins less popular, and voting less likely.
If Britain goes back into lockdown this winter, our government and our conspiracy theorists will be equally responsible for it, and for the deaths of a winter wave. There is not a terror group or tyrant in the world capable of something that damaging, nor quite as likely to get away with it."…
"Spreading lies that damage the NHS, downgrade democracy, or cause child deformities is a crime against all that Britain is supposed to stand for, but it’s difficult to proscribe a loose affiliation of lunatics. Updating our laws to make the spreading of harmful conspiracy theories an act of treason, though, would mean that not only could the ringleaders be shut down, they also could be deradicalised, medicated and educated. They are terrorists, and should be treated as such.
Take out the co-ordinators, and their converts could be deprogrammed. Which would leave the rest of us able to continue the important business of moving as far away as possible from the 14th century, and all its terrifying ignorance." https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/anti-vaxxers-kill-your-babies-25025422
Reeks of desperation to me! The scammers fear that the tide of public feeling is beginning to turn against them, as the massive adverse toll of the stabs, and their ineffectualness even for their claimed ‘benefits’, becomes un-hideable.
So - set on one of the more raving fascists that they keep on their leashes, to pour out this poison: Desperately trying to keep the poison-stab train going by upping the ante on divide and rule. I presume that the author of this Mirror sewage will turn out to be a sucked-in member of the belief-cult of the vaccine, one of the Deceived Influencers, rabid as mass-psychosis-cult members usually are when confronting unbelievers: : the ‘Other’, to be destroyed - in ‘quarantine’ camps, presumably. .
I wonder whether the scammers realise that they could provoke actual civil war with this sort of insane rhetoric?
Hi folks,
talk about psychologically projecting ! maybe the DM should listen to 2 of the leading lights in vaccination technology : Robert Malone who invented the mRNA technique and Geert Vanden Bossche who worked for Pfizer in vaccine research - here they both say that THE VACCINATED are a higher risk for becoming SUPERSPREADERS and mass vaccination could possibly become lethal to all mankind as the VACCINATED only eliminate the original virus specifically and not new more infectious and in the future possibly lethal strains.
the full video 25th Sept 2021 here on youtube for the moment:
( This is too technical for me but this is what I took away from it, corrections more than welcome:
-the vaccinated are a higher risk for becoming superspreaders of the virus because they get infected as much as the unvaccinated don’t have serious symptoms and so they are more around in the community -spreading could account for some of the surge in Israel. But there could also be a higher death rate among the vaccinated.
The vaccinated are causing the risk not the unvaccinated.
GVB: The problem is MASS vaccination we should have just vaccinated the vulnerable.
Where high vaccination there is a plateau of high infection
but a lot of the virus will be eliminated by the unvaccinated so long as there are enough of them and so reduce the infectious pressure.
When you get infected you shed about 10% of the viral load which can be picked up by others – the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated is that the former will shed virus particles from later variants which escape the vaccine ( and this is targeted at the original viruses not the later variants) whereas the unvaccinated will shed the same 10% but they will be shedding both new variants and the original in the ratio of their viral load because the innate system is attacking all variants and original strains – so they shed less of the new more infectious variants. If the more deadly strains become more widespread then these will be passed on by the vaccinated whereas the unvaccinated will be taking out 90% of them. RM appeared to agree with GVB on this. )
There is also this recent research which is not yet peer reviewed ( and given what they say may never be!) which fits in perfectly with what GVB said and may explain the rise in cancers in those where the cancer had been in remission. See Ryan Cole the US pathologist here: