Kit and colleagues at OG have been sounding the ‘they’re all in it together’ chorus lately, claiming that the dissension between the Anglozionist empire and Sino-Rus is a deceitful facade.
Saker, otoh, reckons it really is much more of Oceania versus Eurasia and Eastasia; a real oppositional struggle.
Andrei’s return-from-rest debut piece offers more material for his viewpoint. I see the anomalies which make Kit so suspicious (the Sino-Rus cooperation with the WHO, and their apparent buying in to the ‘global pandemic’ scam, ‘vaccines’ and all, Putin’s cordial behaviour towards his old acquaintance “dear Klaus”, etc), but my hunch is that none of this negates the much more harshly-realistic realpolitik picture which Andrei paints:
1 Like
A bit of a gruelling read, which I bailed out of two-thirds through. Will tackle the rest later. I was genuinely shocked by the words attributed to Lech Walesa. I hadn’t figured him as one of the psychos:
Comparing the actions of the West and Russia, the former president said that the West and NATO expand their influence by democratic means, while Russia does it by violence.
Has he been in a deep freeze the last thirty years…?
1 Like
The Saker was quite wrong at the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. He claimed that the Ukraine Army was trapped in closing ‘cauldrons’ in the east, and the open side of the ‘cauldron’ was controlled completely by Russian firepower.
If this had been true the Russians could have gone south from Belaruss or north from Crimea and closed the cauldrons completely and thus attacked the Ukraine army from the rear, from the west. Also they could have prevented the resupply of both equipment and troops. This didn’t happen either.
I think the USA directed (information, communication, satellite etc) Ukrainian military surprised the Russians, and the Saker, with their ability to resist the Russian/Luhansk/Doneskt advance. Not just from the dug in positions, well prepared, but from behind these dug in positions, keeping the supply lines open to the west.
Of course that hasn’t changed the ultimate outcome…Gonzolo Lira claims that once Donetsk is completely taken there will be no effective resistance between the Russian/allied forces and the Dneiper river, nor beyond that river.
We will see. A bloody shame for all those young men on both sides to be slaughtered and wounded just because the Empire cannot negotiate or admit its decline…
1 Like
Could be so, E. But you have to admit that Russia literally at war with what PepeE calls ‘NATOstan’ is hardly the picture which Kit proposes: of all three global power centres being in cahoots to promote the NWO. Some cahoots, with Russia blasting the shit out of one of the others.
Regarding the current position of the in-progress Russian defeat of NATOstan: I think Shoigu’s recent visit, to ask the commanders what else they needed, and then to tell them to get bloody on with it, will make a difference. The actually-militarily-competent commentators are now speaking of an upcoming further thrust westward by Russian forces, which will complete their takeover of all lands east of the Dnieper; followed by a drive towards Odessa and Transnistria. And after that, perhaps, a ceasefire, to discuss with the chastened Euros what’s to be done with what’s left of what Batiushka calls: ‘the former Ukraine’? (From which discussions the collapsing Anglozionist empire will be invited to piss off…)
1 Like
In terms of tech and surveillance, medical tech, control of populations, if that’s how we define the new world order, I think it’s just like earlier industrialization policy, they ‘all’ do it.
That doesn’t mean they are working together and the war is fake.
But I think we should keep in mind that for the elites guiding the Empire, it’s not really a loss if they ‘lose’ Ukraine, the oil companies and the Military Industrial Complex are making lots of money. However in the long run, for those imperial elites who can think in those terms, the Empire is losing. At some point there will probably be a public confrontation between the short term elites and the long term thinkers, when the future of a generalized loss of world power becomes more obvious.
2 Likes