Taken from this BBC report.
All I can say is:
Holy fuck!
If youâre misunderstanding it, so am I. (Thatâs not unlikely, I suppose.)
Itâs an astonishing âadmissionâ. How long will it stay up, I wonder.
Hi folks, itâs clear that the JCVI figures for benefits in blue are guestimates without any factual basis ( how can any so-called expert be certain that anyone avoided hospital or ICU in the first place never mind claiming such avoidance was due to a vaccine dose or due to anything else!?). The red figures are presumably from the Yellow Card system which are closer to the facts but even the regulator running the system have admitted they could only be capturing a small percentage of actual injuries and deaths!
Didnât Peter McCullough talk about kids suffering myocarditis at rates of 19x higher than background rates?
cheers
Sure, I accept all that, but even these figures are pretty damning. Only 95.19 per million âbetter offâ, but at a cost of 51 cases of myocarditis over the two doses, with the second dose being far riskier than the virus. Again, am I misunderstanding???
These are said to be JCVI figures - they admitted that the benefits were too marginal for them to agree kids should be jabbed unless the regional health officers saw non-medical reasons for approving them , which of course they did.
And of course the word has been spread that the myo-thingy isnât that bad!
cheers
True, but the figures are for only myocarditis and not the raft of other possibilities. Equally, the admissions and ICU figures donât account for any other pre-existing medical conditions. If you were a parent (not off of here, obvs), would you take those odds?
My bet is the parents looking at this graph are themselves jabbed and sold on it and so will only focus on just the raw numbers for the first jab.
If this is the best they can come up with then what are they hiding, we know:
- 0% risk of catching covid
- alternative and prophilactic treatments available with 80% to 100% success for early treatment.
- massive worst case risks of death and lifetime serious diseases from the jab.
Youâre not missing anything, this is the final stage of propaganda - self-manufactured âinformedâ consent!
cheers
Beyond belief that anyone would look at this graphic and conclude the jab is a good idea. The negative part of the calculation is pure conjecture, of course.
Thanks Jamie for spotting this and putting it up.
Even in the web article the BBC says n-o-t-h-i-n-g about Myocarditis and/or how serious it is.
When the news (which was not news to the vaccine research medics) first appeared and it was being denied as ânot necessarily the vaccineâ, it was also put around that it wasnât serious - using carefully chosen words. Here is the BBC in October.
"Most cases of myocarditis after vaccination were resolved quickly following treatment. "
Link Covid: Misleading vaccine claims target children and parents - BBC News
This is shockingly misleading.
In a presentation to Americas Frontline Doctors, Dr Lee Merrit (referring to adults) stated that myocarditis has a 5-year mortality of 66%.
Link: Military Doctor: âThe COVID Vaccine Program has Killed More Young Active Duty People Than COVID Didâ
I looked around for corroborration and finding a few studies, could see that though Dr Merritâs estimate seemed on the high side, it was in the ballpark. In the studies that I could find, if you conservatively make it 10 years and settle for 50% then the estimate was well supported. ie, 50% of adults die within 10 years.
So, according to this, and Dr Merrit as well, myocarditis kills adults at a rate not far off typical cancer rates.
I doubt that treatment âresolvesâ quickly - maybe it means that some cases are found to be light, and the others more grave.
Anyone remember Canadaâs Dr Hodkinsonâ withering response: âMyocarditis is ALWAYS seriousâ?
What about in children. Maybe there is a Disney version made of gumdrops!?
No, there isnât.
I didnât find so many studies of myocarditis in children where they focussed sufficiently on the mortality to produce a figure. But here is the Myocarditis Foundation estimate:
The mortality rate in newborn infants has been reported as high as 75%, while estimates in older children generally range from 10-30%. If a child survives the early acute phase of the disease, their chances for long-term survival very good. MYOCARDITIS IN CHILDREN: INCIDENCE, CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOMES - Myocarditis Foundation
Note how the medical issue is still survival.
That (unsourced) BBC figure of 12-34 cases of myocarditis per million following 2 doses looks like it might be a low version.
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17: A Stratified National Database Analysis
Authors: Tracy Beth Høeg MD, PhD1; Allison Krug, MPH2; Josh Stevenson3; John Mandrola, MD4
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17:
A Stratified National Database Analysis
ABSTRACT Objectives: Establishing the rate of post-vaccination cardiac myocarditis in the 12-15 and 16-17-year-old population in the context of their COVID-19 hospitalization risk is critical for developing a vaccination recommendation framework that balances harms with benefits for this patient demographic.
⌠Results: A total of 257 CAEs were identified. Rates per million following dose 2 among males
were 162.2 (ages 12-15) and 94.0 (ages 16-17); among females, rates were 13.0 and 13.4 per million, respectively. For boys 12-15 without medical comorbidities receiving their second mRNA vaccination dose, the rate of CAE is 3.7 to 6.1 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk as of August 21, 2021 (7-day hospitalizations 1.5/100k population) and 2.6-4.3-fold higher at times of high weekly hospitalization risk (7-day hospitalizations 2.1/100k), such as during January 2021. For boys 16-17 without medical comorbidities, the rate of CAE is currently 2.1 to 3.5 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk, and 1.5 to 2.5 times higher at times of high weekly COVID-19 hospitalization.
EDIT: The BBC link also says
âMyocarditis is actually more common after catching Covid than after the vaccine.â
This is also a blatant attempt to mislead parents into thinking the vaccine reduces the chance of myocarditis anyway. It doesnât - the BBC statement is premised on already having caught Covid. And children rarely do.
So thatâs two important pieces of misleading spin - misinformation - buried amongst a flurry of distracting noise about âmisleading claimsâ, and BBC conspiracy theories (see the âCo-ordinated campaignâ claim as well).
And using the figures above, all for a 0.0095% chance of your child being hospitalised. (Not even dead, note, just hospitalised.)
What is astonishing is that not only have the dangers of myocarditis, which IS a very serious injury, been known since almost the start of the vaxing, but the particular danger to young men - 1 in 5-6000 are at risk - makes it far more dangerous than COVID for this age group and those still younger.
Currently in OZ there is STILL hardly any acknowledgement of the dangers of myo/pericarditis from mRNA, except amongst the better disinformed resisters, but we will see the vax approved for 5-11 year olds within weeks, and parents falling over themselves to protect their children so they can go safely back to school. It is INSANE. But it is also criminal negligence and misconduct on a massive scale, as doctors are being told it is safe, and likely will be told to leave the job if they dare say it isnât and refuse to administer the stuff.
Meanwhile I know several people who have had to take on sole responsibility for taking kids to swimming or childcare or school because the unvaxed parent is forbidden.
We now have something called OzSAGE - a group of around 50 specialists and scientists who are forging ahead with the prop around getting kids vaxed. There is simply no-one to stand in the way of this delinquent project. Parents who donât get their kids vaxed are also subject to abuse from other parents if they dare to come nearâŚ