I left a comment on one small matter in Michael’s piece. I can’t judge whether Andrei’s censors will pass it, so I include it here, just for the record:
SELFQUOTE:
The tinpot-gangster al Saud clan ruling Arabia attacked the US on 11/9/01, Michael? Really?
An odd glitch in an otherwise excellent article. Be advised that the best hypothesis - according to actual realworld evidence - is that 11/9 was the long-nurtured brain-child of elements within the ruling ‘elite’ of zionistan-in-Palestine (ziP), with willing treacherous collusion from elements within the US ruling ‘elite’. The al Saud thugs were only marginally involved; barely at all.
Even amongst the community of truth-seekers about 11/9, the zionistanista origin of the 11/9 atrocities is not widely accepted, perhaps. But Chris Bollyn - at Bollyn.com - still seems to me to offer the most convincing account of how, and where, the conspiracy was originated. It was always a ziP baby. Thus do the supremely treacherous ziPper ‘elite’ reward their chief benefactors, the US tax-payers.
UNQUOTE