5 Filters

Alberta Chief Scientific Officer admits in court that covid-19 virus has not been isolated

Campaigner and lockdown-accused (and billed for 1200 Canadian dollars) Patrick King challenged the legality of lockdown measures in court, and demanded proof of provenance of the virus i.e. isolation. He seems to have been told this isolation proof does not exist.

According to King, who had had to subpoena the Chief Medical Officer for Alberta in order to be able to pose this question to her personally, this renders legally mandatory Covid measures invalid. I don’t know about that myself, there are still quibbles about his own case; according to the clip on Stew Peters show, documents and’or transcripts are going to appear on the link stewpeters.tv.

If it is as King says another potential casualty could be Christian Drosten’s PCR test, which campaigners say has always been on a shaky foundation. I think it is known from the speed that Drosten didn’t base the test on the complete virus. Still the admission will be hailed by campaigners as a moral victory.

UPDATE: Guess what’s happened.
Breakenridge: Why the rush in casting aside Alberta’s remaining COVID-19 safety net?

2 Likes

Hilarious, unintentionally I guess: how will we know where we stand without ‘our’ tests and regular updates of the R number? (Paraphrasing liberally.)

How did humankind cope for all those millennia huh?! :roll_eyes:

1 Like

As @Kieran_Telo said, hilarious. What’s very illuminating about the media’s involvement in all this, is the second linked article asks lots of questions (“is this the right thing to do”, “why the rush”, etc, etc), but says NOTHING at all about the court case that brought about this U-turn change in policy.

1 Like