5 Filters

Guardian make up its own story

#1

MPs blame Boris Johnson’s ‘poison’ after protesters mob Keir Starmer
Police rescue Labour leader from anti-vaxxers shouting ‘traitor’ and ‘Jimmy Savile’ days after PM’s smear of Starmer in parliament

Actually the only voice I could make out was the main one - shouting about Starmer betraying the workers and repeatedly asking why he went after Julian Assange/journalists.

Somehow this means they are anti-vax or conspiracy theorist thugs (this was David Lammy) and Boris Johnson’s ‘fleas’.

Though it is perfectly clear there was no physical threat, the Guardian reassures us that Starmer was ‘unharmed’.

I couldn’t hear any mention of vaccinations or Savile.

So legitimate accusations of Starmer betraying the workers and ignoring the Magna Carta, are turned into Boris’s fault for encouraging anti-vaxxer scum.

Another £1 the Guardian owes everyone :wink:. At least - I’m not sure the Sun or Express could do worse than this.

2 Likes
#2

I think it was the Duran guys the other day who described the Fraudian as “a neocon paper”. That seems an apt description, particularly since Kath Viner became editor.

In the boatyard back-waters where I’m one of the liveaboard boat owners, it’s a custom for skippers to leave read and discarded daily papers in the communal post room we have, for people to use as fire-lighter in their boat-stoves. I find also that they come in handy to cut up into loo-paper pieces. The daily lugenpresse actually does have some genuine uses after all, you see… :slight_smile:

Though personally, I’d sooner see the trees left standing; imagine turning such noble beings into the transient blabber-secretions of the likes of madam Viner and her brothelful of mediawhores!

2 Likes
#3

The duplicity of the press is definitel;y another reason to spare the trees.
Have you got a better use for the BBC radio news bulletins?
Someone in the crowd may have ‘shouted’ about Savile but it wasn’t the kind of shouting that is audible…According to the morphed version I just heard, now on BBC Radio news, Starmer was surrounded by people chanting Savile’s name! The video tells a wholly different story: the shouting was about Starmer’s position on Julian Assange and journalists.

The News=Nudge Everyone With S***.

2 Likes
#4

Oh I would never have known about Starmer’s role in the Savile cover-up if it hadn’t been for nasty Bowwis.

Second and third level deception going on here, not least the distinct possibility that the mob was rented, or at least the part that staged this atrocious assault on a much loved public figure. It’ll be stones through the window (but from the inside) of the constituency office next. Or did that one happen already and was blamed on Far Left Corbynistas?

pj1

1 Like
#5

“Oh I would never have known about Starmer’s role in the Savile cover-up if it hadn’t been for nasty Bowwis.”

The non-nasty sources are constantly busy whitening Starmer’s image. He’s the Labour leader, so he might be a good guy, as long as the more revealing aspects of his past are made to swirl down the memory hole. Many fully distrust him, but like myself can’t always remember why. He didn’t support Assange, was all I could remember…but of course it was a lot more than that:

" Starmer presided over the destruction of sensitive files on the Assange case during his time as DPP. Those that were released, thanks to dogged Freedom of Information (FoI) requests by investigative journalist Stefania Maurizi, were heavily redacted, with crucial details blotted out. Maurizi’s appeal to publish the correspondence between the CPS and Holder’s office was rejected tout court on the grounds that it “would be prejudicial to international relations”. In 2013, the CPS similarly refused Assange’s request to view the personal information it had stored on him, explaining that his case was still a “live matter”. Yet, contradictorily, when asked to account for its mass deletion of files related to the case, a CPS spokesperson stated it was “not live” after all, having “concluded in 2012”. It is partly on account of these evasions and redactions that Starmer’s personal involvement in the Assange affair remains opaque. We still have no record of the relevant exchanges between him and his subordinates. Yet we know from Starmer’s own statements that he expected to be “regularly briefed” on any “high profile case” such as this one, so his complicity in its unorthodox handling can be inferred; and we know Starmer had pledged to assist the overseas interests of the Obama administration, for whom Assange’s capture was paramount."

The inclusion of the word ‘journalists’ in the shouting - the old fashioned kind of shouting, that can actually be heard - was not just about Assange but reference to autistic hacker Gary KcKinnon - who never published anything - who Starmer all but delivered to the US until being overridden by Theresa May, to Starmers reported fury.

According to the information in this article, servant of the secuirity state is a pretty accurate description:

You do get the impression that TPTB would be delighted if Starmer were to ascend to the throne.

2 Likes
#6

The Destroy-Corbyn operation was doubly successful: It banished any immediate prospect for any improvement in Britain in economic justice, social security, or substantive real democracy, neatly disenfranchising a sizeable chunk of the electorate in the process. And it nicely shoe-horned into ‘authority’ over the mostly brain-dead PLP exactly the sort of trusty comprador agent that the English-raj class and the MI5/6 secret-state mil-authoritarians prefer; and as preferred by their kissablearse overlords in the Swamp, obviously.

He’ll do very nicely as a reliably-pliable, woodentop-cipher PM, once the spectacularly-useless Bojo-the-Clown is removed, and the Official Tories finally pass their sell-by for this parliament, in their customary end-of-administration miasma of stinking corruption and uselessness.

Pretty well nothing remains of the ideals and purposes which animated Old Labour, when it was a genuine, actually-mildly-socialist representative of the British working class. B’Liar’s destruction is now complete: Ex-Labour is now the Paedominster representative of the pastel-shaded, faintly pinky-bluey wing of the bourgeois-technocrat class; just when their future as movers’n’shakers in society is now looking distinctly shaky, the poor deluded fools; not least because the suckers have swallowed - and supported rabidly - the pseudopandemic scam, like the utter mooncalves they so often are.

Plebs hustling and loud-mouthing at a DC-kissing creep like Starmer is much less than he deserves. Got away much too lightly!

Oh for a return of the times when elections were a sort of popular riot festival, with candidates subjected to some seriously-robust critique and shout-down, reinforced by heat-seeking eggs and tomatoes - before eventually getting their sinecures, of course…

At least we had a brief chance to show them how we really respected them, then.

2 Likes
#7

Undoubtedly.

I won’t pretend I know/knew much about him in his CPS days, let alone the chicanery you outlined in relation to Assange. His slippery behaviour in the Corbyn years, and the way in which key trade unions backed him, and then smoothly changed their Gen Secs, everyone emerging all shiny and centrist in about a nine month period, was cleverly coordinated.

That was quite enough to convince me that he’s a very dangerous authoritarian, and an unashamed opportunist liar. So: Prime Ministerial, then.

1 Like
#8

According to Dr Cremola (extract below, in bold), the cofounder of the Center for Dreaming Up and then Spreading Digital Hate (or something like that) left for a chief of staff position with Starmer. Nuff said.

From 7/2/22

Dark Money Hate Group Wags the Media Dog

"…Also rote by now is the media’s reliance on statements made by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), which claims Substack is generating “at least $2.5 million a year in revenue from just five anti-vaccine leaders who have amassed tens of thousands of subscribers, each paying $50 a year.”7,8

The CCDH also claims the content on Substack is “so bad no one else will host it.” That seems pretty illogical, if you ask me, considering people are willing to pay for content they were used to getting for free.

Normally, people aren’t willing to pay for something they think is useless, or worse, will harm them if followed. When it comes to health in particular, it usually only takes one or two failed recommendations to turn people off for all time. So, why would people follow me onto a paid platform?

Funny enough, in its latest report,9 the CCDH claims “The New York Times described the osteopathic physician Joseph Mercola as the most influential spreader of coronavirus misinformation online in 2021.” Meanwhile, The New York Times cites10 the CCDH as the source of that claim! So, the CCDH is using media reports of its own fabricated claims about me to support yet another set of defamatory claims.

They’ve obviously failed to update their lies as they never integrated Joe Rogan into their equation. His interviews with Peter McCullough and Robert Malone together garnered over 100 million views, putting him far, far ahead of me in reaching the public.

A Coordinated Brainwashing Campaign

The fact that all multiple news outlets rely on the CCDH’s reports, while never asking any questions about the group itself, or how it justifies its fake claims, is a surefire indication that a PR company is directing this censorship campaign.

That’s what PR companies do — they craft the messaging and coordinate the timing of the publication of that information. Reporters, meanwhile, have surrendered to this top-down dissemination of “news” and ceased to even pretend that they’re following journalistic standards. None of them points out that Facebook itself has called out the CCDH as a fabricator of lies.

August 18, 2021, Facebook’s vice president of content policy, Monika Bickert, issued a statement11,12 saying there is no evidence to support the CCDH’s claims that 12 people were responsible for 73% of vaccine misinformation on Facebook. After an investigation, they found we were in fact responsible for only a tiny fraction — 0.05% — of all vaccine content on Facebook. Here’s an excerpt from Bickert’s statement:13

“In recent weeks, there has been a debate about whether the global problem of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation can be solved simply by removing 12 people from social media platforms. People who have advanced this narrative contend that these 12 people are responsible for 73% of online vaccine misinformation on Facebook. There isn’t any evidence to support this claim …

In fact, these 12 people are responsible for about just 0.05% of all views of vaccine-related content on Facebook. This includes all vaccine-related posts they’ve shared, whether true or false, as well as URLs associated with these people.

The report 14 upon which the faulty narrative is based analyzed only a narrow set of 483 pieces of content over six weeks from only 30 groups, some of which are as small as 2,500 users. They are in no way representative of the hundreds of millions of posts that people have shared about COVID-19 vaccines in the past months on Facebook.

Further, there is no explanation for how the organization behind the report identified the content they describe as ‘anti-vax’ or how they chose the 30 groups they included in their analysis. There is no justification for their claim that their data constitute a ‘representative sample’ of the content shared across our apps.”

Who and What Is the CCDH?

So, just what is the CCDH? It’s one-man organization with undisclosed funding and highly suspect connections to the technocratic “deep state.” Since the beginning of the COVID pandemic in 2020, the CCDH has been on the forefront calling for censorship and deplatforming of anyone who questions experimental COVID jabs.15

Indeed, there’s reason to suspect that’s why this organization was founded in the first place. It fabricates “reports” filled with opinions not backed by any solid data, and those reports are then used by mainstream media and government leaders to justify this censorship racket.

Aside from its founder and CEO Imran Ahmed, an unregistered foreign agent, the CCDH consists of a seven-person board of directors that “supports and scrutinizes” Ahmed’s work. And, while funding is stated as coming primarily from “philanthropic trusts,” no specific trusts are listed.

Digging into the composition of the board of directors provides us with some interesting clues as to its purpose. Through the connection of cofounder Morgan McSweeney — who left the CCDH for a chief of staff position with Labor Pary leader Keir Starmer — we can deduce that the CCDH is connected with the technocratic hub that is the Trilateral Commission, where Starmer is a serving member.16

The group can also be linked to other technocratic centers within the globalist network through its board chairman Simon Clark and board member Kirsty McNeill.17

Clark is a senior fellow for the policy think-tank Center for American Progress and chairman of Foreign Policy for America, other members of which include Stephen Grand, a senior fellow of the Atlantic Council, and Avril Haines, former deputy director of the CIA and a participant in Event 201.18

Simon also served as the first director of web services for Reuters, one of the three global news agencies responsible for curating a vast majority of the world’s news. McNeill, meanwhile, is a member of the European Council of Foreign Relations — another key player behind The Great Reset — and director of policy for Save the Children Fund, which is funded by the Gates Foundation and a partner of Gates’ GAVI Vaccine Alliance.

Another board member is Damian Collins, a member of the British Parliament and former chair of the House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee. Collins also founded Infotagion, which “seeks to fight the disinformation contagion about COVID-19.”19

CCDH Protects The Great Reset Agenda

When you think about it, isn’t it rather curious that the Constitutional rights of American citizens are violated based on the opinions of an unregistered foreign agent who runs a tiny little pop-up group funded by dark money?20 As noted in a July 20, 2021, Drill Down article:21

“According to its website, the left-wing Center for Countering Digital Hate prides itself on ‘researching, exposing, and then shutting down users and news sites it deems unacceptable in the digital sphere.’ Users and news sites it deems unacceptable? That seems potentially dangerous, considering we know very little about the CCDH. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) expressed his concerns on Twitter with the following post:

‘Who is funding this overseas dark money group — Big Tech? Billionaire activists? Foreign governments? We have no idea. Americans deserve to know what foreign interests are attempting to influence American democracy’ …

No one knows who funds them. No one knows who is driving their research. But their findings are being used in censorship efforts under the guise of controlling misinformation?”
"

21 The Drill Down July 20, 2021

2 Likes
Remember the Center for Circulating Digital Hate
#9

… and here’s Craig Murray…

1 Like
#10

As blatant a conflict of interest as you are likely to see outside the world of pharmaceuticals:

“The husband of Alison Levitt, the lawyer appointed by Starmer to investigate the non-prosecution of Jenner, was very much a part of the Establishment rallying around in 1991 to block the prosecution of Janner.”

Murray is biting well!

"It is extraordinary that these people manage to become so rich and powerful when they are entirely unobservant. Especially as Levitt, Starmer, Carlile and Jenner were all top QCs.

Anyway, that is just an everyday tale of unobservant folk. "

" Here is the clincher in this episode of how the Establishment functions. Carlile went on to found a company, SC Strategy Ltd, in partnership with Sir John Scarlett, former Head of MI6, who obtained that position as the main author of the infamous “Dodgy dossier” of lies on Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction. They were joined for a while as a Director of that company by Lord Arbuthnot, former Tory junior defence minister and husband of Lady Arbuthnot.

Lady Arbuthnot was the initial and later supervising magistrate on the Assange extradition hearings."

“I have often noticed that ordinary people like you and I manage, in general, to live our entire lives with no connection of friendship to paedophiles at all. Yet the powerful are always finding they are connected to Janners, Epsteins, Saviles, Smiths, Mountbattens etc entirely by accident. It is of course all nothing but accident, bad luck and coincidence. To wonder if it might be otherwise is to be a mad proto-Fascist conspiracy theorist, apparently.”

#11

He’s definitely in good form there. The article is a sequel to an earlier piece of a few days ago which could nicely be summarised as “the Establishment likes Starmer and is tiring of Johnson”. Insinuations of close ties with CIA too, quelle surprise.