Dmitry Orlov doesn’t buy the covid scam, R. Does he? Do you see signs of that? I get all his mailouts, and I don’t think I see that. Saker and Chomsky, yes sure. As to the Bovril Boat: I don’t follow that site now, so I wouldn’t know.
The stance that seems to me to be soberly thought through goes like this:
Yes, there’s a nasty flu-alike about. As flus usually do, it kills some, gives some a really nasty illness, and has some longer-term nasty after effects for some; but most won’t be much bothered by it, and will get long-term broadscale natural immunity from it afterwards.
Yes, a ghastly global crime-against-humanity has been set going on the back of this flu, which looks as if it was engineered, and probably is still being engineered, for the job.
Yes, there has been a lamentable stampede of multitudes of people who really should know better to swallow the scammers’ narrative, though that’s losing headway now.
And yes, the poison-stabs are a disaster, a mass-killing, mass-crippling crime, which clearly have some unadmitted sinister purpose behind them, and longer term bad effects that are yet to come clear.
By now, I personally feel fairly confident about these statements. But open-minded scepticism still rools, OK! I think that many observer/commentators, confronting the same global confusion as me, will have made variously different sets of tentative conclusions. All we can do is observe, mull, hold our horses, and wait for more solid, certain clarity to emerge.
But internecine hyper-slagging of each other over points of difference in our - unavoidably-tentative - judgements isn’t useful. Waggaman is not a reliable source in this respect. He has a history…